![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
The effectiveness of bioremediation is often a function of the microbial population and how they can be enriched and maintained in an environment. Strategies for inexpensive in situ bioremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons include stimulation of the indigenous microorganisms by introduction of nutrients (biostimulation) and/or through inoculation of an enriched mixed microbial culture into soil (bioaugmentation). To demonstrate the potential use of bioremediation in soil contaminated with kerosene, a laboratory study with the objective of evaluating and comparing the effects of bioattenuation, biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation was performed. The present study dealt with the biodegradation of kerosene in soil under different bioremediation treatment strategies: bioattenuation, biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation, respectively. Each treatment strategy contained 10% (w/w) kerosene in soil as a sole source of carbon and energy. After 5 weeks of remediation, the results revealed that bioattenuation, bioaugmentation, biostimulation, and combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation exhibited 44.1%, 67.8%, 83.1%, and 87.3% kerosene degradation, respectively. Also, the total hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria (THDB) count in all the treatments increased with time up till the second week after which it decreased. The highest bacterial growth was observed for combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment strategy. A first-order kinetic model equation was fitted to the biodegradation data to further evaluate the rate of biodegradation and the results showed that the specific degradation rate constant (k) value was comparatively higher for combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment strategy than the values for other treatments. Therefore, value of the kinetic parameter showed that the degree of effectiveness of these bioremediation strategies in the clean up of soil contaminated with kerosene is in the following order: bioattenuation < bioaugmentation < biostimulation < combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Conclusively, the present work has defined combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatment strategy requirements for kerosene oil degradation and thus opened an avenue for its remediation from contaminated soil.