320
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus on EMS Clinicians

EMS Program Graduates Who Did Not Retest after Initial Attempt on the National Certification Exam

Pages 664-672 | Received 24 Mar 2021, Accepted 10 Jun 2021, Published online: 12 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Introduction: Becoming an EMS professional in most of the United States requires successful completion of the National Certification process. While multiple attempts are allowed, some candidates who are unsuccessful on their first cognitive examination attempt do not return despite personal investment. Objective: We describe the demographic and testing characteristics of EMT and paramedic candidates that do not return for a second examination attempt after an initial unsuccessful attempt on the National EMS Certification Cognitive Examination. Methods: This was a cross-sectional evaluation of nonmilitary EMT and paramedic graduates, between ages 18 and 85 years, who completed their education program in 2016, attempted the National Certification Examination, and were unsuccessful. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of retesting for EMT and paramedic graduates for age, sex, initial test length, and elapsed time from course completion to initial examination. Results: Of all EMT graduates eligible to retest (n = 22,088), 33% (n = 7,208) did not retest. Adjusted odds of retesting for EMT graduates decreased with female sex, time from course completion to initial examination, and those with minimal exam length. Adjusted odds of retesting for EMT graduates increased in 20–21 and 22–24 year olds compared to 18–19 year olds. Similarly, of all paramedic graduates eligible to retest (n = 2,755), 14% (n = 390) did not. Adjusted odds of retesting at the paramedic level decreased with time from course completion to initial examination and minimum exam length. Age and sex were not significant contributors to odds of retesting for paramedics. Conclusion: Many EMTs and paramedics who were unsuccessful on the National Certification Exam did not retest. Factors identified that impact the choice varied between EMTs and paramedics but included age, sex, length of initial examination, and time from course completion to that initial examination. These characteristics may present actionable items for EMS educational programs and stakeholders to support EMT and paramedic graduates at risk of not entering the workforce.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 85.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.