Cross-Generational Comparability of Raw and Count-Based Metrics from ActiGraph GT9X and wGT3X-BT Accelerometers during Free-Living in Youth

ABSTRACT

Free-living comparability of wGT3X-BT and GT9X ActiGraphs has not been verified. Participants (n = 34, 35% females, 7–17 y) wore hip-worn monitors for one week. Vector magnitude (VM; 15-s epoch), Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) and Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) (5-s epoch), and percent of time spent in each activity intensity (using cut-points) were calculated. At the epoch-level, correlations were strong (r = 0.822–0.963), mean absolute percent difference (MAPD) was 41.5 ± 62.2% (VM), 40.8 ± 52.7% (MAD), and 110.9 ± 74.0%, with moderate (ENMO κ = 0.664–0.789) to strong (VM κ = 0.915) agreement for activity intensity. When collapsed to the individual level, MAPD was 4.2 ± 3.4% (VM), 6.8 ± 3.7% (MAD), and 35.9 ± 26.1% (ENMO), correlations were moderate (ENMO r = 0.618) to high (MAD and VM r = 0.996), but ENMO, MAD, and time spent in activity intensities using ENMO cut-points were not statistically equivalent (using 2 one-sided tests) between monitors. While time spent in activity intensities was often comparable between models, caution is warranted for epoch-level comparisons.

KEYWORDS:

• Monitor
• ENMO
• activity
• measurement
• MAD

Acknowledgments

The Michigan State University College of Education provided support for this project.

Declaration of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Michigan State University College of Education.