355
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Evaluation of Variable-Injection Rate Waterflooding, Immiscible CO2 Flooding, and Water-alternating-CO2 Injection for Heavy Oil Recovery

, , , &
Pages 1656-1669 | Received 02 Jun 2010, Accepted 12 Jul 2010, Published online: 02 Jul 2012
 

Abstract

Despite the existence of studies for separate evaluation of waterflooding, immiscible CO2 flooding, and CO2 water-alternating gas (WAG) for heavy oil recovery, there is a lack of an experimental, comparative evaluation of these three methods. The authors conducted tests for comparative evaluation of variable-injection rate waterflood (VIWF), immiscible CO2 flood, and CO2 WAG. The results illustrate the (a) effectiveness of VIWF, immiscible CO2 flood, and CO2 WAG; (b) effect of permeability and oil viscosity on VIWF, immiscible CO2 flood, and CO2 WAG; (c) effect of injection rate on VIWF; and (d) effect of slug ratio on CO2 WAG.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 855.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.