308
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Feature Articles

How Much Telematics Information Do Insurers Need for Claim Classification?

, &
Pages 570-590 | Published online: 10 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

It has been shown several times in the literature that telematics data collected in motor insurance help to better understand an insured’s driving risk. Insurers who use these data reap several benefits, such as a better estimate of the pure premium, more segmented pricing, and less adverse selection. The flip side of the coin is that collected telematics information is often sensitive and can therefore compromise policyholders’ privacy. Moreover, due to their large volume, this type of data is costly to store and hard to manipulate. These factors, combined with the fact that insurance regulators tend to issue more and more recommendations regarding the collection and use of telematics data, make it important for an insurer to determine the right amount of telematics information to collect. In addition to traditional contract information such as the age and gender of the insured, we have access to a telematics dataset where information is summarized by trip. We first derive several features of interest from these trip summaries before building a claim classification model using both traditional and telematics features. By comparing a few classification algorithms, we find that logistic regression with lasso penalty is the most suitable for our problem. Using this model, we develop a method to determine how much information about policyholders’ driving should be kept by an insurer. Using real data from a North American insurance company, we find that telematics data become redundant after about 3 months or 4000 km of observation, at least from a claim classification perspective.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge The Co-operators for both financial support and for providing the data used in this paper through the Co-operators Chair in Actuarial Risk Analysis. The authors also thank the editors and the three anonymous reviewers for providing feedback and helping them.

FUNDING

The authors thank The Co-operators and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for funding.

Discussions on this article can be submitted until July 1, 2023. The authors reserve the right to reply to any discussion. Please see the Instructions for Authors found online at http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj for submission instructions.

Notes

1 Table 2 of this article informs us that 99.5% of the policyholders have one claim or less.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 114.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.