872
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Metaphorical Character of Moral Cognition: A Comparative and Decompositional Analysis

Pages 163-183 | Published online: 16 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

This article studies the moral metaphor system focusing on a subsystem consisting of five pairs of MORAL and IMMORAL metaphors whose source concepts represent some contrastive categories in our visual experience: WHITE and BLACK, LIGHT and DARK, CLEAR and MURKY, CLEAN and DIRTY, PURE and IMPURE. The study examines whether these moral metaphors are manifested in Chinese and English, looking for linguistic evidence in both languages. It is found that the studied moral metaphors are applicable in both languages at varying degrees. This finding suggests that these metaphors may range from being widespread to being universal. The study then further analyzes them regarding whether they are primary or complex metaphors and whether they are equal in status, applying a decompositional approach to metaphor analysis. The result suggests that the moral metaphors under study are complex rather than primary metaphors, and that they are actually not equal in status, some depending on others in meaning making in our moral cognition. If the analysis is valid, the implications are: some conceptual metaphors are more fundamental than others, those that are more fundamental are more likely to be widespread or universal, and hypotheses can be made about conceptual metaphors based on in-depth analysis of their conceptual composition.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author is very grateful to Ray Gibbs and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments and useful suggestions, which have led to much improvement in the revision of the paper.

Notes

1 My suggestion that GOOD IS PURE is not a primary metaphor is based on the observation that PURE (“unmixed with other matter”) is inherently neutral with two possible alternatives in value: “unmixed with unwanted (positive)/wanted (negative) matter.” Thus, e.g., in “pure folly” and “pure terrorism” (from COCA), pure is not positive in meaning. That is, PURE is a more complex concept than is CLEAN, which is intrinsically positive and more basic in character, simply meaning “free from dirt or unwanted matter.”

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 401.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.