The Importance of Cognitive Dissonance in Understanding and Treating Victims of Intimate Partner Violence

ABSTRACT

External mechanisms and batterer behaviors have commonly been cited as to why women remain in intimate partner violence relationships. However, past research has generally minimized the focus on individual psychological elements of victims that perpetuate their commitments to abusers. The current review proposes the potential for cognitive dissonance resolution as an underlying mechanism to affect female victims’ stay/leave decisions while in domestically violent relationships. High and low levels of self-esteem differentially affect the resolution of cognitive dissonance as explained by self-consistency and self-affirmation theories. Theories of commitment including the foot-in-the-door principle, justification of effort, and the investment model are applied specifically to the arousal of dissonance in victims. The importance of taking into account the mechanisms of dissonance arousal and subsequent reduction techniques are proposed for treating this population and preventing similar relationships in the future.

KEYWORDS:

• Cognitive dissonance
• commitment
• intimate partner violence
• self-esteem

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding/Disclosure of Interest: Author has no financial disclosures.

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Christie Cathey and Joan McClennen for their comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.