Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering
Volume 48, 2013 - Issue 10
282
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Dutch dominant perspective on water; risks and opportunities involved

, , , &
Pages 1164-1177 | Received 11 Jan 2013, Published online: 06 May 2013
 

Abstract

To implement or continue water management strategies social support is needed. Social support highly depends on people's perspectives on water. However, these perspectives are not static and may change over time leading to changes in social support for strategies. Therefore, sustainable water management strategies should be robust. Robust strategies are able to cope with changing social and environmental developments. Lacking robustness runs the risk of losing social support, which may force policymakers into sudden or expensive measures. We use the Perspectives Method to analyze the present Dutch policy perspective and the dominant perspective on water among Dutch water professionals, by respectively studying the Dutch Delta report and questionnaire outputs and distinguishing between Hierarchical, Egalitarian, Individualistic and Fatalistic perspectives. A comparison between the policy and professional perspective shows similarities and differences. Topics regarding drought, water supply, and waters’ relation to spatial planning need serious reconsideration to guarantee enough present and future social support to implement the measures suggested in the policy report.

Acknowledgments

This article is part of the project “Perspectives in Integrated water Resources Management in River Deltas” and we thank Deltares and ICIS for funding this project. We thank Willem van Deursen for developing the interface for the online questionnaire and the respondents for investing their valuable time to fill out the questionnaire. We furthermore thank Eelco van Beek (Deltares/ Twente University), Hans Middelkoop (Utrecht University), Michael van Lieshout (Pantopicon), Jules Beersma (KNMI) and Neven Duic (University of Zagreb) for their input. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 709.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.