566
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Blood-borne biomarkers and bioindicators for linking exposure to health effects in environmental health science

, &
Pages 380-409 | Published online: 19 Oct 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Environmental health science aims to link environmental pollution sources to adverse health outcomes to develop effective exposure intervention strategies that reduce long-term disease risks. Over the past few decades, the public health community recognized that health risk is driven by interaction between the human genome and external environment. Now that the human genetic code has been sequenced, establishing this “G × E” (gene–environment) interaction requires a similar effort to decode the human exposome, which is the accumulation of an individual’s environmental exposures and metabolic responses throughout the person’s lifetime. The exposome is composed of endogenous and exogenous chemicals, many of which are measurable as biomarkers in blood, breath, and urine. Exposure to pollutants is assessed by analyzing biofluids for the pollutant itself or its metabolic products. New methods are being developed to use a subset of biomarkers, termed bioindicators, to demonstrate biological changes indicative of future adverse health effects. Typically, environmental biomarkers are assessed using noninvasive (excreted) media, such as breath and urine. Blood is often avoided for biomonitoring due to practical reasons such as medical personnel, infectious waste, or clinical setting, despite the fact that blood represents the central compartment that interacts with every living cell and is the most relevant biofluid for certain applications and analyses. The aims of this study were to (1) review the current use of blood samples in environmental health research, (2) briefly contrast blood with other biological media, and (3) propose additional applications for blood analysis in human exposure research.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for advice and encouragement from Myriam Medina-Vera, Jon Sobus, Michael Madden, Timothy Buckley, and Michelle Angrish from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development has subjected this article to agency administrative review and approved it for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement for use.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 396.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.