1,412
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Critical Review Discussion

Trends in on-road transportation, energy, and emissions

, , , , , , , & show all

Introduction

The 2018 Critical Review (CR) (Frey Citation2018) provided a comprehensive summary of motor vehicle technologies, fuels, emissions, and emission controls. It demonstrated how these have changed over past decades and projected how technology innovations and regulations related to emissions and efficiency are driving the changes. Herein, expert discussants and the CR author provide additional perspectives and information on the topic. The appearance of these discussants as co-authors does not necessarily indicate their agreement with the opinions of other discussants. Transportation has changed several times over past 120 years. Early gasoline engines competed with steam-powered and electric means of locomotion. There were experiments with gas turbines in the 1950s, with diesel-powered passenger cars gaining ground in the 1980s in response to oil embargos and fuel shortages. Natural gas, propane, ethanol, and hydrogen also are being used as fuels. Electric vehicles (EVs) recharged with grid power will continually reduce air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as power generation becomes more efficient and renewable.

A manufacturer’s perspective on motor vehicle innovations for the future: comments from Susan Collet

As the CR emphasizes, the use of most on-road vehicles results in pollutant emissions with environmental consequences. Toyota’s continental U.S. ozone (O3) source apportionment study (Collet et al. Citation2018) applied the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) with Ozone Source Apportionment Technology (OSAT), and the Community Multi-Scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Integrated Source Apportionment Method (ISAM) to determine relative contributions from different sources. Emissions included non-U.S., natural, global boundary conditions, point sources, other area sources, off-road mobile, and on-road mobile sources. On-road emissions were further divided into light-duty gasoline vehicles (LDGV), heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDV), and other on-road mobile categories. Base-year 2011 simulations were evaluated against ambient measurements to demonstrate model performance, and then projections for 2030 O3 design values were estimated for each U.S. state. Both CAMx and CMAQ estimated similar design values. With projected 2030 emissions, the models predict that most states will attain or be close to attaining the 70 ppb O3 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). However, California is predicted to reach 135% of the NAAQS. The 2030 LDGV emissions are predicted to contribute <5% of the O3. Boundary conditions, representing emissions that are unmanageable, contribute up to 70% of O3 in the eastern United States and up to 90% of O3 in the western U.S. In the eastern U.S., stationary sources contribute up to 35% and off-road mobile emissions contribute up to 30% of O3. These projections indicate that further O3 reductions will require efforts that go beyond reducing LDGV exhaust emissions.

The Toyota Motors (Citation2018) Environmental Challenge for the year 2050 intends to eliminate its environmental footprint. Toyota produces ~10 million vehicles per year globally, and an increasing fraction of this total includes EVs, an essential step to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Vehicle electrification in the form of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and fuel cell vehicles will gain importance, especially beyond the year 2020. Toyota recently announced a goal of 5.5 million EVs by the year 2030. A dedicated or electrified option for all models will be available by 2025, and more than 10 battery electric models will be introduced in the 2020s, first in China, followed by Japan, India, the U.S., and the European Union (EU).

One of the major hurdles is producing larger capacity batteries (Andwari et al. Citation2017; Zubi et al. Citation2018), with an increase from the current HEV battery capacity of 0.75 kilowatt-hours (kWh) to the ~40-kWh capacity needed for a sufficient driving range. Toyota has a collaboration with Panasonic Corporation to develop and manufacture globally competitive batteries that have high energy densities, high supply capacities, and reasonable costs. Vehicle manufacturers, electric utilities, and government agencies are readying the social infrastructure that will support EVs, such as provision of charging stations, battery reuse and recycling, and recovery of rare earth metals (Kim et al. Citation2016; Sarkar, Sarkar, and Bharadwaj Citation2018). Recycling and reuse actions currently applied to HEVs can be expanded to include BEVs.

Fuel cells offer another zero emissions alternative, depending on how the hydrogen is produced. Toyota’s Mirai (Consumer Reports Citation2017) fuel cell vehicle, with ~3000 units sold or leased in California, refuels in 3 to 5 minutes, and has a ~500-km range. There are 35 hydrogen stations open in California, with more in various stages of construction. A zero-emission class 8 proof-of-concept truck has completed more than 6,400 successful development kilometers while progressively pulling drayage-rated cargo weight and emitting nothing but water vapor.

A mixture of solutions is needed to meet the 2050 challenge. The concepts mentioned here are steps toward ever-better vehicles that enrich the lives of communities and are contributing to a sustainable society.

Importance of engine exhaust for urban pollution and global warming: Comments from Michael P. Walsh

Because there are so many vehicles on the world’s highways—more than 1.3 billion cars, trucks, and buses—and because more are produced each year, approaching 100 million during 2018, vehicles remain important contributors to urban, regional, and global pollution levels (Walsh Citation2018). In some cities such as Beijing, China, vehicles are large particulate matter (PM) contributors (China Daily Citation2018). The urban air pollution problem is most severe in the developing world where used vehicles are frequently dumped to live out their highly polluting second lives.

More than 110 million people in the U.S. live in areas that exceed NAAQS (U.S.EPA Citation2018). Many European cities have been unable to achieve nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and PM air quality guidelines. In rapidly industrializing countries such as India and China, cities exceed World Health Organization PM guidelines by factors of 10 or more (WorldAtlas Citation2018). PM levels in Delhi, India, have exceeded the top limits on the measurement systems. In many African countries, air quality levels are not known because no ambient measurements are recorded; satellite data, however, indicate high concentrations of PM and other pollutants. Smoke belching from buses and trucks is a clear indication of high pollutant emissions.

The most serious air pollution concern is global climate change. Atmospheric CO2 levels are exceeding 400 ppm, amounts that have not been seen in at least 650,000 years (NASA Citation2018). The U.S. Fourth National Climate Assessment (GCRP Citation2018) shows that:

  • Average surface air temperatures have increased by 1.8ºF since 1901.

  • 2015–2017 was the warmest period on record.

  • Human activity is the dominant cause of observed warming.

  • Global sea level has risen 18-20 centimeters since 1900.

  • Ocean temperatures have increased, glaciers have melted, snow cover is diminished, sea ice is shrinking, and oceans are acidifying.

  • Wildfires in the western U.S. and Alaska are increasing.

Driven in part by the more than a 50-year effort by U.S. regulators, and especially those in California, as well as the regulated manufacturers, technology exists and is being incorporated into new vehicles to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), PM, and other toxic substances from cars, trucks, buses, and many non-road vehicles by more than an order of magnitude compared to pre-controlled vehicles. New cars and trucks sold in China and India are becoming almost as clean. The majority of gasoline-fueled cars produced this year will be equipped with a catalytic converter, a technology first introduced in the U.S. in 1975 that dramatically lowers pollutant emissions.

Reductions are also being made for CO2, vehicle-related halocarbons (Andersen, Halberstadt, and Borgford-Parnell Citation2013; Eklund et al. Citation2013), and short-lived climate forcers such as black carbon (BC). Unfortunately, the current pace of progress is not sufficient to attain the targets specified in the Paris Agreement (UNFCCC Citation2018), which are necessary to contain global warming within 2°C. If the recent proposal (DOT and U.S.EPA Citation2018) to relax current Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) standards goes into effect, and especially if it prevents California from continuing its global leadership, the global shortfall in climate-forcing emission reductions will be that much greater.

As Volkswagen’s use of defeat devices shows (Muncrief, German, and Schultz Citation2016), tight vehicle standards certified by laboratory testing don’t necessarily translate into comparable vehicle emissions under real-world driving conditions. Dieselgate, as the discovery of the defeat device is sometimes called, is currently leading to a declining market share of diesels across Europe, which may negatively affect CO2 emissions.

Converting the entire global fleet to less polluting technologies presents many challenges, especially with regard to cost, supply, and charging infrastructure. Since China is now the largest new vehicle market, its aggressive New Energy Vehicle program (ICCT Citation2018) has led to major investments in these advanced technologies by all the major vehicle manufacturers. This increases the potential to bring about a paradigm shift away from the internal combustion (IC) engine. If the global sense of urgency regarding climate change persists, the pressure to move away from fossil fuels and IC engines will increase.

Transportation electrification, planning, automation, and emissions enforcement: Comments from Alberto Ayala

Transportation electrification, transportation planning and sustainable land use, the emergence of connected, autonomous, shared, and electric vehicles (CASEVs), and the need for robust compliance with and enforcement of fuel economy and emission standards merit further discussion. Despite being a small share of the total vehicle fleet, the light-duty EV market has grown past early adopters into a broader segment owing to falling costs of batteries, fuel cells, and related technologies. Cost parity between EV and IC vehicles is only 6 to 8 years in the future (Liebreich Citation2016). EVs have many advantages over ICs, and they are a no-compromise and cheat-proof alternative with respect to emissions. There is no need for sequencing the roll-out of EVs before a full green, clean electric grid is a reality. Even in regions where EV electrons may be coal based, there are still environmental benefits. EVs eliminate the risk of near-source human exposure to IC toxics. EVs also lessen the urban heat island effect (Li et al. Citation2015) and hold promise for new value streams from emerging vehicle-to-grid and other integrated resource management opportunities. Many of these developments are also occurring in the heavy-duty vehicle and equipment sector. EV markets in China, Japan, Europe, and various U.S. states, including California, serve as evidence of the slow, but steady progress toward a mass EV market. Political leaders from France, Great Britain, and China are speaking openly about a diesel car ban, while others speak more broadly of IC bans. In California, there is a legislative push for banning IC vehicle sales after 2040 (Ting et al. Citation2018).

The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (California Legislature Citation2008) mandates the integration of land use, transportation planning at the local level, and environmental review to reduce GHG emissions (Nealer, Reichmuth, and Anair Citation2015). Targets based on per-capita GHG emission reductions encourage transportation mode shifts and innovation to improve mobility along with cleaner transportation. As more of these smart growth and sustainable development ideas spread across the world, the impacts on the expected trends for global transportation energy can be significant and positive.

To ensure this outcome is closer to the “heaven” described by Sperling (Citation2018), new regulations, city ordinances, and regional incentives can work together to promote CASEVs. These could involve CASEV-only zones, links to transit, beneficial road charges, and congestion mitigation using priority drop off areas. The alternative is a “hell” scenario of more congestion, growth in kilometers traveled, and minimal integration with public transit (Fulton Citation2018). The decision for policymakers is either to stand on the sidelines and let the transformation go by or to proactively guide it toward the desired, environmentally preferred outcome.

The degree to which real-world vehicle emissions attain the applicable standards will have a definitive impact on the trends noted in the CR. Since IC vehicles will be in use for many decades, strong compliance and enforcement are needed to ensure the integrity of existing standards and certification requirements. Three years after recognition of the Volkswagen diesel defeat device (Ayala Citation2018), new and very useful approaches are emerging. The European Union’s option for third-party in-use emission testing using Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS) under the Euro 6 Real-world Driving Emissions (RDE) requirements is one of the best ideas for moving forward. Represented by an inverted pyramid, new screening methods and selection of test vehicles will involve approaches like remote sensing or “socializing” the use of PEMS. This should allow for the screening of thousands of on-road vehicles. This screening would identify vehicles for in-depth testing in the emissions laboratory. The objective is to improve the robustness of the existing California program, which yielded the discovery and resolution of environmental violations so well publicized to date.

Defeat devices are not new: Comments from Samuel L. Altshuler

The Volkswagen NOx defeat device situation is similar to that of HDDV engine manufacturers that took place in the late 1990s (U.S.EPA Citation1998), as noted in the CR. The manufacturers programmed their engines to recognize the test cycle and then degrade engine performance to attain the NOx emission standard. After being caught, the seven manufacturers entered into a consent decree (Kennedy Citation1999) that involved an $83 million fine and a more than $1 billion investment to remove the defeat on more than 1 million engines. It is apparent that NOx emission control devices can be turned on and off. Diesel NOx emissions could be controlled by satellite location (using GPS technology), season, air quality/weather, and/or time of day. Urban-scale ambient O3 and NOx measurements could be used to switch diesel NOx controls on or off. Since history seems to repeat itself, there is a need for continuous real-world emission measurements to complement the laboratory-based compliance tests.

In the 1970s the electric utilities and copper smelters advocated curtailment of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions by reducing production based on meteorology and measured ground-level concentrations, termed “intermittent control” (Taylor, Rubin, and Hounshell Citation2005). This approach was soon abandoned with recognition of the long-range effects of high SO2 emissions and their reaction products on ecosystems, visibility, and human health (Hidy Citation1984; Pope and Dockery Citation2006; Prinz Citation1985; Vedal Citation1997; Watson Citation2002). However, other forms of intermittent control have evolved; the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) in gasoline changes twice a year from winter to summer and vice versa. Diesel fuels also have summer and winter blends. The San Francisco Bay Area’s Spare The Air program (BAAQMD Citation2018) is another form of intermittent control that beseeches residents to curtail driving and wood burning during forecasts of poor air quality.

Several related topics would benefit from elaboration in future reviews. The California experience with EVs, HEVs, renewable natural gas (RNG), and hydrogen merits more attention. Natural gas has been successfully used as a vehicle fuel with an octane rating of ~130 in a gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. The Westport (Citation2018) dual fuel high pressure direct injection (HPDI) engine combines the attributes of clean natural gas combustion combined with diesel engine efficiency. Integrating vehicle batteries into the grid for energy storage could alleviate the intermittent nature of wind and solar electricity (Coignard et al. Citation2018).

Emerging technologies will enhance near-road monitoring: Comments from Eric D. Stevenson

Emission contributions on and near roadways exceed those measured at typical compliance stations. Advances in monitoring technologies (Hidy et al. Citation2017; Kleinman et al. Citation2017) may permit these measurements to estimate exposures for people who spend time in these microenvironments. EPA’s (Citation2012; Citation2017) near-roadway monitoring requirements provide a means to “truth-test” exposure models. Tunnel studies yield insight into exhaust emissions and document improvements in emission control technologies (Ban-Weiss et al. Citation2008; Cui et al. Citation2018; Gaga et al. Citation2018; Ho et al. Citation2009; Kean, Harley, and Kendall Citation2003; Kirchstetter et al. Citation1996; Wang et al. Citation2018; Worton et al. Citation2014). Cross-plume remote sensing (Bishop et al. Citation2012; Bishop, Stedman, and Ashbaugh Citation1996; Bishop, Stedman, and Jessop Citation1992; Fujita et al. Citation2012) and satellite detection from space (Hidy et al. Citation2009; Hoff and Christopher Citation2009) have also increased knowledge of the near-roadway environment, the effectiveness of emission controls, and emission decreases over time.

While fixed-site compliance monitoring generates excellent temporal information, it lacks the spatial resolution needed to broaden understanding of microenvironmental exposures. Mobile monitoring can provide the spatial coverage, but it does not address temporal variations that occur as traffic and regional contributions change. Commuters and near-road residents are exposed to higher levels of HCs, NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 (PM with aerodynamic diameter <10 µm and <2.5 µm), BC, and particle number (PN) concentrations than are measured at neighborhood- and urban-scale compliance stations. As discussed in the following, PN and BC emissions are becoming a larger concern for GDI and diesel engines. More highly time and spatially resolved measurements are needed in near-roadway environments that are accurate, precise, and valid. These measurements need to be acquired for long-enough periods to estimate chronic exposures and their associated health outcomes. California’s Assembly Bill 617 (Garcia Citation2017) is a step in the right direction, if it is carried out with forethought and consideration of these issues.

In addition to remote sensing techniques mentioned in the preceding, in situ mass spectrometry (Canagaratna et al. Citation2010; Williams et al. Citation2014; Zhao et al. Citation2013) that provides a wide spectrum of gas and particle measurements will increase understanding of the compositional changes in near-roadway environments. Satellite measurements with wide compositional, somewhat time-resolved and finer spatial scales may also provide needed information. Lower cost sensors (SCAQMD Citation2018) that allow greater spatial resolution may also be of value and can be incorporated on vehicles themselves. All of these techniques need to be further improved and implemented to better assess the health implications of changing vehicle emissions.

The human health perspective: Comments from Rashid Shaikh

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project (IHME Citation2018) provides a systematic review of the effects of exposure to outdoor air pollution, which has been consistently among top-ranked global risk factors. According to the 2016 estimates, outdoor PM2.5 exposure contributed to more than 4 million premature deaths (7.5% of all deaths) and more than 100 million years-of-healthy-life lost. Although there are many uncertainties, the GBD estimates are the best available assessments of mortality and disability from major diseases, injuries, and risk factors. A case study of source-specific estimates for China highlights some important features of these estimates. Under four different energy efficiency and air pollution control scenarios between now and the year 2030, population-weighted mean exposure to PM2.5 is projected to decrease. However, the overall health burden is projected to increase under even the most stringent policy scenarios. This is a consequence of an aging Chinese population and disease patterns, and it argues for more aggressive strategies to reduce emissions.

Although U.S. pollution levels have decreased, can human health improvements related to these improvements be quantified? Evaluating the extent to which air quality interventions improve public health is the field of accountability research (HEI Citation2018). Air pollution policies should reduce pollutant emissions, resulting in air quality improvements. This would, in turn, reduce human exposure and lead to better health of the affected populations. Establishing a reliable association between policies and health effects is challenging. Regulatory changes almost always overlap with other changes and trends—such as economic activity, meteorology, access to health care, smoking prevalence, other regulations, and residential mobility. Some studies have examined these relationships (Gilliland et al. Citation2017).

Recent investigations are showing adverse health effects in Medicare recipients detected below the current NAAQS, particularly for PM2.5 and O3 (Di et al. Citation2017; Makar et al. Citation2017). The association between mortality and PM2.5 exposures was stronger for males than for females and also stronger for minority groups. The association was weaker for exposure to O3 and the confidence intervals were much wider; there were also some inexplicable “negative” associations for Hispanics and Asians, suggesting a “protective” effect of O3 exposure. There are important uncertainties with these analyses, particularly since smoking data were not available, nor was information on many other confounders, in the Medicare cohort. Since Medicare data are publicly available, the results of these studies are subject to replication by other investigators.

The U.S. and other developed countries have reduced air pollution from mobile and other sources, even with increases in the number of vehicles and distances driven. The current challenge is to meet increases in mobility demand around the world, particularly in developing countries. Transportation technologies must continue to reduce emissions, particularly of GHGs, and to build the technology and markets for EVs.

Particle number and black carbon measurements for vehicle emissions: Comments from Judith C. Chow and John G. Watson

The measurement and standardization of PN and BC emissions merits greater elaboration. Excessive PN exposures create public health hazards (Biswas and Wu Citation2005; Chow et al. Citation2005). BC is a recognized indicator of adverse health effects (Eklund et al. Citation2014; Grahame, Klemm, and Schlesinger Citation2014) and contributes to global warming (Fiore, Naik, and Leibensperger Citation2015; Kleinman et al. Citation2015).

The Euro 6 light-duty gasoline engine emission standard (DieselNet Citation2018) limits solid particle number (SPN) emissions to 6 × 1012 particles/km for engines with model years 2014–2016, which is reduced to 6 × 1011 particles/km for model year 2017 and beyond. As noted in the CR, SPN is limited to solid particles with electrical mobility diameters >23 µm that have been heated to 300–400°C (UN/ECE Citation2015), thereby removing potentially toxic organic compounds that are adsorbed onto what is often a BC core and neglecting the much smaller particles that can penetrate from the lung and into the blood stream. Emission standards have not yet been established for BC, although opacity tests are administered as part of some states’ diesel inspection and maintenance programs (Chow et al. Citation2001; Lloyd and Cackette Citation2001; McCormick et al. Citation2003).

The CR recognizes that the market penetration of GDI engines is important for both PN and BC emitted to the environment. Although GDI engines have lower CO2 emissions per distance traveled than conventional port fuel injection (PFI) engines (Alkidas Citation2007), they tend to emit higher PN, BC, and PM mass concentrations due to incomplete fuel volatilization, partially in fuel-rich zones, and impingement of fuel on piston and cylinder surfaces (An et al. Citation2016; He, Ratcliff, and Zig Citation2012; Jiao and Reitz Citation2015; Karjalainen et al. Citation2014; Maricq et al. Citation1999). PM mass from a GDI engine appears to have a large BC component (Maricq, Szente, and Jahr Citation2012). Depending on engine operating conditions, particles may consist of various amounts of amorphous carbon, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and ash contents (Karjalainen et al. Citation2014; Momenimovahed et al. Citation2015; Momenimovahed and Olfert Citation2015; Zelenyuk et al. Citation2016). The majority of PNs are smaller than 100 nm (Amanatidis et al. Citation2017; Chen et al. Citation2017; Hassaneen, Samuel, and Whelan Citation2011; Myung and Park Citation2012; Myung et al. Citation2012; Myung, Ko, and Park Citation2014; Tan et al. Citation2016; Yamada, Funato, and Sakurai Citation2015). Wang et al. (Citation2014) illustrate PN and PM mass distributions (derived from the PN assuming spherical particles and densities) from a GDI engine with different cylinder and fuel injection pressures. They show that higher fuel injection pressures reduce BC formation in the larger particle mode, but increase the PN concentrations in the smaller particles. It appears that there is a trade-off between PN and BC concentrations as a function of injection pressure for these more fuel-efficient engines.

Dwyer et al. (Citation2010) further illustrate the effects of volatility of and variability on PN emissions, with emission factors differing by factors of 3 or more depending on the driving cycle and the vehicle tested. Up to 50% of the PN disappeared at temperatures exceeding 200°C. Although these temperatures are not achieved in ambient air, SVOCs in this region can still slowly evaporate as the gas-phase concentrations of these compounds decrease with dilution and aging in ambient air. The volatility for a large fraction of the PN makes it difficult to regulate this indicator in source emissions or ambient air. In their efforts to obtain a more “reproducible” measurement, the European Particle Measurement Program (PMP) method (Giechaskiel et al. Citation2008; Johnson et al. Citation2009; Wang et al. Citation2010) does not obtain a “real-world” PN measurement of what people will inhale. A more realistic estimate of PN emissions to ambient air would facilitate understanding of ultrafine aerosol evolution with distance from the point of emission.

Consistent measurements for BC show greater promise for establishing emission standards. Kamboures et al. (Citation2013) demonstrate high and consistent correlations among different BC measurement methods, even when applied to very low emitting engines. Their conclusions are that “BC measurements in the sub 1 mg/mi range are possible and current PFI and GDI vehicles appear to emit BC at these very low levels.”

The final word: Comments from H. Christopher Frey

The CR focused primarily on empirical evidence for U.S. national and international trends in on-road transportation energy use and emissions, with additional consideration of factors affecting travel demand and vehicle operation, measurement methods, and impacts of emissions on exposure and health. However, given the wide-ranging scope of the subject, it was not possible to treat all topics in the CR in great depth, and some topics were beyond the scope. The discussants have appropriately identified numerous topics that merit further elaboration. On-road transportation and the energy it involves are the subject of much technological change, leading to changing adverse effects of mobile source emissions on the environment. The CR and this discussion set more of a marker in time than a definitive endpoint for this topic, and it is hoped that future contributors to the journal will build on these articles.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Samuel L. Altshuler

Samuel L. Altshuler is an air quality consultant and current chair of the Critical Review Committee.

Alberto Ayala

Alberto Ayala is air pollution control officer and Executive Director at the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.

Susan Collet

Susan Collet is an executive engineer at Toyota Motors North America, Inc.

Judith C. Chow

Judith C. Chow is a research professor at the Desert Research Institute, past chair of the Critical Review Committee, and author of the 1995 Critical Review.

H. Christopher Frey

H. Christopher Frey is the Glenn E. Futrell Distinguished University Professor of Environmental Engineering at North Carolina State University and author of the 2018 Critical Review.

Rashid Shaikh

Rashid Shaikh is Director of Science at the Health Effects Institute.

Eric D. Stevenson

Eric D. Stevenson is Director of the Meteorology and Measurements Division at the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and vice-chair of the Critical Review Committee.

Michael P. Walsh

Michael P. Walsh is a consultant on clean transportation.

John G. Watson

John G. Watson is a research professor at the Desert Research Institute, past chair of the Critical Review Committee, and author of the 2002 Critical Review.

References

  • Alkidas, A. C. 2007. Combustion advancements in gasoline engines. Energy Convers. Manag. 48:2751–2761. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2007.07.027.
  • Amanatidis, S., M. M. Marieq, L. Ntziachristos, and Z. Samaras. 2017. Application of the dual pegasor particle sensor to real-time measurement of motor vehicle exhaust PM. J. Aerosol Sci. 103:93–104. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.10.005.
  • An, Y. Z., X. Li, S. P. Teng, K. Wang, Y. Q. Pei, J. Qin, and H. Zhao. 2016. Fuel 179:246–257. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.100.
  • Andersen, S. O., M. L. Halberstadt, and N. Borgford-Parnell. 2013. Critical review: Stratospheric ozone, global warming, and the principle of unintended consequences-An ongoing science and policy success story. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 63:607–647. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.791349.
  • Andwari, A. M., A. Pesiridis, S. Rajoo, R. Martinez-Botas, and V. Esfahanian. 2017. A review of battery electric vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renew Sust. Energ. Rev. 78:414–430. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.138.
  • Ayala, A. 2018. In recognition of this special journal issue on real-world emissions on CARB’s leadership and central role in uncovering and resolving the environmental violations from Volkswagen’s use of illegal diesel defeat devices. Sci. Total Environ. 642:1441–1443. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.235.
  • BAAQMD. 2018. Spare the air. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, San Francisco, CA. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.sparetheair.org/.
  • Ban-Weiss, G. A., J. P. McLaughlin, R. A. Harley, M. M. Lunden, T. W. Kirchstetter, A. J. Kean, A. W. Strawa, E. D. Stevenson, and G. R. Kendall. 2008. Long-term changes in emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 42:220–232. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.049.
  • Bishop, G. A., B. G. Schuchmann, D. H. Stedman, and D. R. Lawson. 2012. Multispecies remote sensing measurements of vehicle emissions on Sherman way in Van Nuys, California. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62:1127–1133. doi:10.1080/10962247.2012.699015.
  • Bishop, G. A., D. H. Stedman, and L. L. Ashbaugh. 1996. Motor vehicle emissions variability. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 46:667–675. doi:10.1080/10473289.1996.10467501.
  • Bishop, G. A., D. H. Stedman, and T. Jessop. 1992. Infrared emission and remote sensing. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 42:695–697. doi:10.1080/10473289.1992.10467022.
  • Biswas, P., and C. Y. Wu. 2005. Critical review: Nanoparticles and the environment. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 55:708–746. doi:10.1080/10473289.2005.10464656.
  • CaliforniaLegislature. 2008. SB-375: Transportation planning: Travel demand models; sustainable communities strategy: environmental review. California Legislative Information, Sacramento, CA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=200720080SB375.
  • Canagaratna, M. R., T. B. Onasch, E. C. Wood, S. C. Herndon, J. T. Jayne, E. S. Cross, R. C. Miake-Lye, C. E. Kolb, and D. R. Worsnop. 2010. Evolution of vehicle exhaust particles in the atmosphere. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 60:1192–1203. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.60.10.1192.
  • Chen, L. F., Z. R. Liang, X. Zhang, and S. J. Shuai. 2017. Characterizing particulate matter emissions from GDI and PFI vehicles under transient and cold start conditions. Fuel 189:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.055.
  • China Daily. 2018. Coal burning no longer major source of Beijing PM2.5: Study. China Daily, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China.  Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201805/14/WS5af94c18a3103f6866ee8415.html.
  • Chow, J. C., J. G. Watson, N. Savage, J. Solomon, Y. S. Cheng, P. H. McMurry, L. M. Corey, G. M. Bruce, R. C. Pleus, P. Biswas, and C. Y. Wu. 2005. Nanoparticles and the environment: Critical review discussion. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 55:1411–1417. doi:10.1080/10473289.2005.10464743.
  • Chow, J. C., S. K. Hoekman, J. M. Norbeck, K. N. Black, R. M. O’keefe, D. L. Kopinski, M. P. Walsh, J. L. Sucheki, S. L. Altshuler, B. MacClarence, R. A. Harley, and D. Marrack. 2001. Diesel engines: Environmental impact and control: Critical review discussion. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 51:1258–1270. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464354.
  • Coignard, J., S. Saxena, J. Greenblatt, and D. Wang. 2018. Clean vehicles as an enabler for a clean electricity grid. Environ. Res. Lett. 13. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabe97.
  • Collet, S., T. Kidokoro, P. Karamchandani, J. Jung, and T. Shah. 2018. Future year ozone source attribution modeling study using CMAQ-ISAM. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 68. online. doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1496954.
  • ConsumerReports. 2017. Toyota mirai review: Hydrogen-powered hipness. Consumer Reports, Yonkers, NY, USA.  Accessed August 10, 2018.  https://www.consumerreports.org/hybrids-evs/toyota-mirai-review-hydrogen-powered-hipness/.
  • Cui, L., X. L. Wang, K. F. Ho, Y. Gao, C. Liu, S. S. H. Ho, H. W. Li, S. C. Lee, X. M. Wang, B. Q. Jiang, Y. Huang, J. C. Chow, J. G. Watson, and L.-W. A. Chen. 2018. Decrease of VOC emissions from vehicular emissions’ in Hong Kong from 2003 to 2015: Results from a tunnel, study. Atmos. Environ. 177:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.020.
  • Di, Q., L. Z. Dai, Y. Wang, A. Zanobetti, C. Choirat, J. D. Schwartz, and F. Dominici. 2017. Association of short-term exposure to air pollution with mortality in older adults. JAMA-Journal Am. Med. Assoc. 318:2446–2456. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.17923.
  • DieselNet. 2018. Emission standards: Summary of worldwide diesel emission standards. Ecopoint, Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/#na.
  • DOT and U.S.EPA. 2018. The safer affordable fuel-efficient (SAFE) vehicles rule for model years 2021-2026 passenger cars and light trucks. U.S. Department of Transportation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-08/documents/safe-my-2021-2026-cafe-ld-ghg-nhtsa-epa-nprm-2018-08-02.pdf.
  • Dwyer, H., A. Ayala, S. Zhang, J. Collins, T. Huai, J. Herner, and W. Chau. 2010. A study of emissions from a euro 4 light duty diesel vehicle with the european particulate measurement programme. Atmos. Environ. 44:3469-3476. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.028.
  • Eklund, A. G., G. M. Hidy, J. G. Watson, and J. C. Chow. 2014. Public health and components of particulate matter: The changing assessment of black carbon-critical review introduction. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64:617–619. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.799984.
  • Eklund, A. G., S. L. Altshuler, P. C. Altshuler, J. C. Chow, G. M. Hidy, A. C. Lloyd, M. J. Prather, J. G. Watson, P. Zalzal, S. O. Andersen, M. L. Halberstadt, and N. Borgford-Parnell. 2013. Stratospheric ozone, global warming, and the principle of unintended consequences-An ongoing science and policy story: Critical review discussion. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 63:1235–1244. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.847317.
  • Fiore, A. M., V. Naik, and E. M. Leibensperger. 2015. Critical review: Air quality and climate connections. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 65:645–685. doi:10.1080/10962247.2015.1040526.
  • Frey, H. C. 2018. Critical review: Trends in onroad transportation energy and emissions. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 68:514–563. doi:10.1080/10962247.2018.1454357.
  • Fujita, E. M., D. E. Campbell, B. Zielinska, J. C. Chow, C. E. Lindhjem, A. DenBleyker, G. A. Bishop, B. G. Schuchmann, D. H. Stedman, and D. R. Lawson. 2012. Comparison of the MOVES2010a, MOBILE6.2 and EMFAC2007 mobile source emissions models with on-road traffic tunnel and remote sensing measurements. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62:1134–1149. doi:10.1080/10962247.2012.699016.
  • Fulton, L. M. 2018. Three revolutions in urban passenger travel. Joule 2:575–578. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.005.
  • Gaga, E. O., A. Arı, N. H. Akyol, Ö. Ö. Üzmez, M. Kara, J. C. Chow, J. G. Watson, E. Özel, T. Döğeroğlu, and M. Odabasi. 2018. Determination of real-world emission factors of trace metals, EC, OC, BTEX, and semivolatile organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs and PCNs) in a rural tunnel in Bilecik, Turkey. Sci. Total Environ. 643:1285–1296. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.227.
  • Garcia, C. 2017. AB-617: Nonvehicular air pollution: Criteria air pollutants and toxic contaminants. California Legislative Information, Sacramento, CA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB617.
  • GCRP. 2018. Climate science special report. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/.
  • Giechaskiel, B., P. Dilara, and J. Andersson. 2008. Particle measurement programme (pmp) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: repeatability and reproducibility of the particle number method. Aerosol Sci.technol. 42:528-543. doi: 10.1080/02786820802.
  • Gilliland, F., E. Avol, R. McConnell, K. Berhane, W. J. Gauderman, F. W. Lurmann, R. Urman, R. Chang, E. B. Rappaport, and S. Howland. 2017. The effects of policy-driven air quality improvements on children’s respiratory health. Health Effects Insitute, Boston, MA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.healtheffects.org/system/files/GillilandRR190.pdf.
  • Grahame, T. J., R. J. Klemm, and R. B. Schlesinger. 2014. Public health and components of particulate matter: The changing assessment of black carbon: Critical review. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64:620–660. doi:10.1080/10962247.2014.912692.
  • Hassaneen, A., S. Samuel, and I. Whelan. 2011. Combustion instabilities and nanoparticles emission fluctuations in GDI spark ignition engine. Int. J. Automotive Technol. 12:787–794. doi:10.1007/s12239-011-0091-z.
  • He, X., M. A. Ratcliff, and B. T. Zig. 2012. Effects of gasoline direct injection engine operating parameters on particle number emissions. Energy & Fuels 26:2014–2027. doi:10.1021/ef201917p.
  • HEI. 2018. Accountability. Health Effects Insitute, Boston, MA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.healtheffects.org/accountability.
  • Hidy, G. M. 1984. Critical review: Source receptor relationships for acid deposition: Pure and simple. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 34:518–531. doi:10.1080/00022470.1984.10465770.
  • Hidy, G. M., J. R. Brook, J. C. Chow, M. C. Green, R. B. Husar, C. Lee, R. D. Scheffe, A. Swanson, and J. G. Watson. 2009. Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: Have we reached the promised land?: Critical review discussion. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 59:1130–1139. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.10.1130.
  • Hidy, G. M., P. K. Mueller, S. L. Altshuler, J. C. Chow, and J. G. Watson. 2017. Critical review: Air quality measurements—From rubber bands to tapping the rainbow. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 67:637–668. doi:10.1080/10962247.2017.1308890.
  • Ho, K. F., S. S. H. Ho, S. C. Lee, Y. Cheng, J. C. Chow, J. G. Watson, P. K. K. Louie, and L. Tian. 2009. Emissions of gas- and particle-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Shing Mun Tunnel, Hong Kong. Atmos. Environ. 43:6343–6351. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.025.
  • Hoff, R. M., and S. A. Christopher. 2009. Critical review: Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: Have we reached the promised land? J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 59:645–675. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.6.645.
  • ICCT. 2018. China’s new energy vehicle mandate policy (Final rule). International Council for Clean Transportation, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/China_NEV_mandate_PolicyUpdate%20_20180525.pdf.
  • IHME. 2018. Global burden of disease (GBD). Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.healthdata.org/gbd.
  • Jiao, Q., and R. D. Reitz. 2015. The effect of operating parameters on soot emissions in GDI engines. SAE Int. J. Engines 8:1322–1333. doi:10.4271/2015-01-1071.
  • Johnson, K.C., T.D. Durbin, H. Jung, A. Chaudhary, D.R. Cocker, J.D. Herner, W.H. Robertson, T. Huai, A. Ayala, and D.B. Kittelson. 2009. Evaluation of the european pmp methodologies during on-road and chassis dynamometer testing for dpf equipped heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 43:962-969. doi: 10.1080/02786820903074810.
  • Kamboures, M. A., S. S. Hu, Y. Yu, J. Sandoval, P. Rieger, S. M. Huang, S. Zhang, I. Dzhema, D. Huo, A. Ayala, and M.-C. O. Chang. 2013. Black carbon emissions in gasoline vehicle exhaust: A measurement and instrument comparison. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 63:886–901. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.787130.
  • Karjalainen, P., L. Pirjola, J. Heikkila, T. Lahnde, T. Tzamkiozis, L. Ntziachristos, J. Keskinen, and T. Ronkko. 2014. Exhaust particles of modern gasoline vehicles: A laboratory and an on-road study. Atmos. Environ. 97:262–270. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.025.
  • Kean, A. J., R. A. Harley, and G. R. Kendall. 2003. Effects of vehicle speed and engine load on motor vehicle emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:3739–3746.
  • Kennedy, H. H. 1999. Consent decree: United States of America v. Mack Trucks, Inc. and Renault, V.I. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-10/documents/mackall-cd.pdf.
  • Kim, H. C., T. J. Wallington, R. Arsenault, C. Bae, S. Ahn, and J. Lee. 2016. Cradle-to-gate emissions from a commercial electric vehicle Li-ion battery: A comparative analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50:7715–7722. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00830.
  • Kirchstetter, T. W., B. C. Singer, R. A. Harley, G. R. Kendall, and W. Chan. 1996. Impact of oxygenated gasoline use on California light-duty vehicle emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:661–670. doi:10.1021/es950406p.
  • Kleinman, M. T., J. D. Bachmann, H. J. Feldman, D. McCabe, J. J. West, and A. F. Fiore. 2015. Connecting air quality and climate change: Critical review discussion. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 65:1283–1291. doi:10.1080/10962247.2015.1095599.
  • Kleinman, M. T., S. J. Head, R. E. Morris, E. D. Stevenson, S. L. Altshuler, J. C. Chow, J. G. Watson, G. M. Hidy, and P. K. Mueller. 2017. Air quality measurements: From rubber bands to tapping the rainbow: Crtical review discussion. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 67:1159–1168. doi:10.1080/10962247.2017.1370309.
  • Li, C. B., Y. J. Cao, M. Zhang, J. H. Wang, J. G. Liu, H. Q. Shi, and Y. H. Geng. 2015. Hidden benefits of electric vehicles for addressing climate change. Sci. Rep. 5:9213. doi:10.1038/srep09213.
  • Liebreich, M. 2016. Liebreich state of the industry keynote BNEF summit 2016. Proceedings, Bloomberg new energy finance summit, New York, NY: Bloomberg NEF. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://data.bloomberglp.com/bnef/sites/4/2016/04/BNEF-Summit-Keynote-2016.pdf.
  • Lloyd, A. C., and T. A. Cackette. 2001. Critical review - diesel engines: Environmental impact and control. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 51:809–847. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464315.
  • Makar, M., J. Antonelli, Q. Di, D. Cutler, J. Schwartz, and F. Dominici. 2017. Estimating the causal effect of low levels of fine particulate matter on hospitalization. Epidemiology 28:627–634. doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000690.
  • Maricq, M. M., D. H. Podsiadlik, D. D. Brehob, and M. Haghgooie. 1999. Particulate emissions from a direct-injection spark-ignition (DISI) engine. SAE Tech. Pap. doi:10.4271/1999-01-1530.
  • Maricq, M. M., J. J. Szente, and K. Jahr. 2012. The impact of ethanol fuel blends on PM emissions from a light-duty GDI vehicle. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46:576–583. doi:10.1080/02786826.2011.648780.
  • McCormick, R. L., M. S. Graboski, T. L. Alleman, J. R. Alvarez, and K. G. Duleep. 2003. Quantifying the emissions benefit of opacity testing and repair of heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:630–637.
  • Momenimovahed, A., D. Handford, M. D. Checkel, and J. S. Olfert. 2015. Particle number emission factors and volatile fraction of particles emitted from on-road gasoline direct injection passenger vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 102:105–111. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.045.
  • Momenimovahed, A., and J. S. Olfert. 2015. Effective density and volatility of particles emitted from gasoline direct injection vehicles and implications for particle mass measurement. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 49:1051–1062. doi:10.1080/02786826.2015.1094181.
  • Muncrief, R., J. German, and J. Schultz. 2016. Defeat devices under the U.S. and EU passenger vehicle emissions testing regulations. International Council for Clean Transportation, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_defeat-devices-reg-briefing_20160322.pdf.
  • Myung, C. L., A. Ko, and S. Park. 2014. Review on characterization of nanoparticle emissions and PM morphology from internal combustion engines: Part 1. Int. J. Automotive Technol. 15:203–218. doi:10.1007/s12239-014-0022-x.
  • Myung, C. L., J. Kim, K. Choi, I. G. Hwang, and S. Park. 2012. Comparative study of engine control strategies for particulate emissions from direct injection light-duty vehicle fueled with gasoline and liquid phase liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Fuel 94:348–355. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.041.
  • Myung, C. L., and S. Park. 2012. Exhaust nanoparticle emissions from internal combustion engines: A review. Int. J. Automotive Technol. 13:9–22. doi:10.1007/s12239-012-0002-y.
  • NASA. 2018. Graphic: The relentless rise of carbon dioxide. National Aeronautics & Space Administration, Pasadena, CA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/.
  • Nealer, R., D. Reichmuth, and D. Anair. 2015. Cleaner cars from cradle to grave: How electric cars beat gasoline cars on lifetime global warming emissions. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-vehicles/electric-vehicles/life-cycle-ev-emissions.
  • Pope, C. A., and D. W. Dockery. 2006. Critical review: Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 56:709–742. doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485.
  • Prinz, B. 1985. Effects of air pollution on forests - Critical review. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 35:913–915. doi:10.1080/00022470.1985.10465970.
  • Sarkar, E. M., T. Sarkar, and M. D. Bharadwaj. 2018. Lithium-ion battery supply chain: Enabling national electric vehicle and renewables targets. Curr. Sci. 114:2453–2458. doi:10.18520/cs/v114/i12/2453-2458.
  • SCAQMD. 2018. AQ-SPEC: Air quality sensor performance evaluation center. South Coast Air Management District, Diamond Bar, CA. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec.
  • Sperling, D. 2018. Three revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better fugure. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  • Tan, J. Y., F. Bonatesta, H. K. Ng, and S. Y. Gan. 2016. Developments in computational fluid dynamics modelling of gasoline direct injection engine combustion and soot emission with chemical kinetic modelling. Appl. Thermal Eng. 107:936–959. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.024.
  • Taylor, M. R., E. S. Rubin, and D. A. Hounshell. 2005. Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: A case of induced technological innovation in the U.S. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 72:697–718. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.11.001.
  • Ting, P. Y., C. Garcia, K. McCarty, M. Berman, R. Bloom, L. Friedman, A. Kalra, M. Stone, and S. D. Wierner. 2018. Vehicles: Clean cars 2040 act. California Legislature, Sacramento, CA. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB1745.
  • ToyotaMotors. 2018. Toyota environmental challenge 2050. Toyota Motor Company, Nagoya, Japan. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.toyota-global.com/sustainability/environment/challenge2050/.
  • U.S.EPA. 1998. Enforcement alert: Clean air act prohibits “defeat devices” in vehicles, engines. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/defeat.pdf.
  • U.S.EPA. 2012. Near-road NO2 monitoring technical assistance document. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/nearroad/NearRoadTAD.pdf.
  • U.S.EPA. 2017. Near-road NO2 monitoring. U.S. Envirionmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/nearroad.html.
  • U.S.EPA. 2018. Our nation’s air continues to improve. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://gispub.epa.gov/air/trendsreport/2018/#summary.
  • UN/ECE. 2015. Regulation No 83 of the economic commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements (Revision 5). Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs81-100.html.
  • UNFCCC. 2018. The Paris agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://unfccc.int/about-us/contact-and-directions/find-contact-by-issue.
  • Vedal, S. 1997. Critical review - ambient particles and health: Lines that divide. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 47:551–581. doi:10.1080/10473289.1997.10463922.
  • Walsh, M. P. 2018. Carlines. Michael P. Walsh, Arlington, VA. Accessed August 10, 2018. http://www.walshcarlines.com/index.html.
  • Wang, C. M., H. M. Xu, J. M. Herreros, J. X. Wang, and R. Cracknell. 2014. Impact of fuel and injection system on particle emissions from a GDI engine. Appl. Energy 132:178–191. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.012.
  • Wang, X. L., K. F. Ho, J. C. Chow, S. D. Kohl, C. S. Chan, L. Cui, S. C. Lee, L.-W. A. Chen, S. S. H. Ho, Y. Cheng, and J. G. Watson. 2018. Hong Kong vehicle emission changes from 2003 to 2015 in the Shing Mun Tunnel. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1–14. doi:10.1080/02786826.2018.1456650.
  • Wang, X.L., R. Caldow, G.J. Sem, N. Hama, and H. Sakurai. 2010. Evaluation of a condensation particle counter for vehicle emission measurement: experimental procedure and effects of calibration aerosol material. J. Aerosol Sci. 41:306-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.01.001.
  • Watson, J. G. 2002. Critical review: Visibility: Science and regulation. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 52:628–713. doi:10.1080/10473289.2002.10470813.
  • Westport. 2018. Westport HPDI 2.0. Westport, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.westport.com/is/core-technologies/hpdi-2.
  • Williams, B. J., J. T. Jayne, A. T. Lambe, T. Hohaus, J. R. Kimmel, D. Sueper, W. Brooks, L. R. Williams, A. M. Trimborn, R. E. Martinez, P. L. Hayes, J. L. Jimenez, N. M. Kreisberg, S. V. Hering, D. R. Worton, A. H. Goldstein, and D. R. Worsnop. 2014. The first combined thermal desorption aerosol gas chromatograph-aerosol mass spectrometer (TAG-AMS). Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48:358–370. doi:10.1080/02786826.2013.875114.
  • WorldAtlas. 2018. Cities with the worst air quality in Asia. Worldatlas, St. Laurent, QU, Canada. Accessed August 10, 2018. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/cities-with-the-worst-air-quality-in-asia.html.
  • Worton, D. R., G. Isaacman, D. R. Gentner, T. R. Dallmann, A. W. H. Chan, C. Ruehl, T. W. Kirchstetter, K. R. Wilson, R. A. Harley, and A. H. Goldstein. 2014. Lubricating oil dominates primary organic aerosol emissions from motor vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48:3698–3706. doi:10.1021/es405375j.
  • Yamada, H., K. Funato, and H. Sakurai. 2015. Application of the PMP methodology to the measurement of sub-23 nm solid particles: Calibration procedures, experimental uncertainties, and data correction methods. J. Aerosol Sci. 88:58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jacrosci.2015.06.002.
  • Zelenyuk, A., J. Wilson, D. Imre, M. A. Stewart, G. G. Muntean, J. Storey, V. Y. Prikhodko, S. Lewis, M. Eibl, and J. E. Parks. 2016. Detailed characterization of particulate matter emitted by lean-burn gasoline direct injection engine. Int. J. Engine Res. doi:10.1177/1468087416675708.
  • Zhao, Y. L., N. M. Kreisberg, D. R. Worton, A. P. Teng, S. V. Hering, and A. H. Goldstein. 2013. Development of an in situ thermal desorption gas chromatography instrument for quantifying atmospheric semi-volatile organic compounds. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 47:258–266. doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.747673.
  • Zubi, G., R. Dufo-Lopez, M. Carvalho, and G. Pasaoglu. 2018. The lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives. Renew Sust. Energ. Rev. 89:292–308. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.