Abstract
How do street-level bureaucrats perceive a client and react when the client exhibits behavior deviating from gender-stereotypical expectations? Introducing a new approach to the study of gender bias in citizen-state interactions, this article focuses on the intersection between clients’ demographic characteristics, behavior, and gender-stereotypical expectations. Using data from a randomized laboratory experiment among child visitation rights caseworkers in Denmark, we examine caseworker responses to two distinct audio vignettes from a meeting in which a client exhibits emotion-based behavior characterized by gender-stereotypical expectations. The two vignettes capture the act of crying and the showing of anger, respectively. We find that caseworkers perceive counter-stereotypical client behavior as more pronounced than stereotypical client behavior: An angry female client is perceived as angrier and more aggressive than an angry male client. Moreover, caseworkers are more inclined to react negatively when female relative to male clients elicit emotion-based behavior that is counter gender-stereotypical.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Mette Bisgaard
Mette Bisgaard is Postdoctoral Researcher at the Department of Political Science, Aarhus University. Her research focuses on citizen-state interactions, client behavior, street-level bureaucracy, stereotypes, and gender and gender bias.
Mogens Jin Pedersen
Mogens Jin Pedersen is Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, and affiliate Senior Researcher at VIVE—The Danish Center for Social Science Research. His research focuses on work motivation, public management and performance, employee behavior and decision-making, heuristics and cognitive biases, gender and race, and research methodology.