Abstract
This study focuses on the determinants of board size and board independence during an economic transition in China. It contributes to the body of Chinese corporate governance studies by applying the most comprehensive analytical framework to the periods before and after the split-share structure reform. Both static and dynamic estimation methods have been used. Overall, the study found that Chinese board size and independence are jointly determined by the scope of operation, cost and benefit of monitoring, CEO’s influence and other governance factors. Among these factors, the government was the most important player in constituting corporate boards before the split-share structure reform; after the reform, board independence became more important than other governance factors. In addition, when constituting corporate boards, private and market-oriented state enterprises are more concerned about cost than are government-controlled enterprises.
Notes
1Following the “The guidelines for independent directors”, independent directors are those who hold no other positions in the company and have no relationships with major shareholders that may affect their independent and objective judgment. Independent directorship is important as a monitoring mechanism to guard against a manager’s self-serving behavior.