Abstract
The treatment of a sick person is an invasive act of a professional and humane nature. It is based on both acquired and proven knowledge, as well as accrued clinical experience. When invading the patient's life during treatment in order to bring about beneficial results, we must rely on these two sources of knowledge. Knowledge based on clinical findings achieve validity in an empiric process of research. Knowledge based on clinical experience, by its very nature, cannot be validated empirically and depends on intuition, analogies, common sense and courage. Courage, among other things, is the ability to recognize one’s own limitations as a therapist during treatment, and the readiness to change and expand them when necessary. This courage is the ability of the therapist to accept the existence of his own strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of his patient and to realize that empathy cannot be total. Furthermore, it is necessary to realize that a certain ambiguity is a necessary part of the treating process.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my colleague Orit Bart, OTR, PhD, who provided insight and comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Without her tenacity and faith in me this article was not submitted.
Disclosure statement
The author reports no conflict of interest.