848
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Occupational engagement following mild stroke in the Australian context using the occupational gaps questionnaire

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 384-390 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 22 Dec 2019, Published online: 06 Jan 2020
 

Abstract

Background

There is a need for research to identify the impact of mild stroke on occupational engagement. The Occupational Gaps Questionnaire (OGQ) measures the difference between a person’s actual and preferred occupational engagement.

Aims/objectives

This study aimed to test the feasibility of the English version of the OGQ, and describe occupational gaps of people with mild stroke.

Material and methods

A mixed methods, cross-sectional study involving 10 people with mild stroke at 1 and/or 9 months after stroke. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively and thematic analysis explored qualitative responses.

Results

Participants reported a mean of 6.7 (SD 5.1) gaps at 1-month and 3.00 (SD 2.1) gaps at 9-months. Outdoor activities, work, sports, and light home and heavy-duty maintenance were identified as gaps at both time-points. Two themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Drivers of occupation and Occupations can be challenged or enabled. An additional finding in terms of feasibility was drawn from qualitative data: Feasibility of Conducting the OGQ with people with mild stroke.

Conclusions and significance

The English version of the OGQ was found to be a feasible instrument for identifying occupational gaps following mild stroke and may be suitable to support research and clinical practice with this population.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the research team of the larger study that recruited the participants: Professor Suzanne Kuys, Dr Andrew Wong, Ms Leah Thompson, and Dr Angela Maguire.

Disclosure statement

The authors are solely responsible for the article’s content and report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Health Practitioner’s Research grant from the Allied Health Professions’ Office of Queensland, a New Investigator Award from The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation, and a University of Queensland Researcher Higher Degree Scholarship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.