Abstract
Background/objective
Constant pain causes suffering and affects performance of activities of daily living (ADL). In clients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, we wanted to determine (i) the relationship between the perceived burden of suffering (measured with the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM)) and the observed quality of ADL task performance (measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)); and (ii) the change in these assessments before and after a 12-week pain programme.
Methods
In this cross-sectional cohort study, we retrospectively collected data from participants in a Swiss pain management programme. We calculated the relationship, correlations and effect sizes for the PRISM and AMPS using non-parametric tests. We set the level of significance at α = 0.05.
Results
Out of 138 clients, 74 participated. We found no significant correlations between the PRISM and AMPS (p = 0.55–0.36), except for the PRISM and AMPS process ability measure after the pain management programme (p = 0.023). Pre-post-correlations of the AMPS and PRISM were significant, with medium to strong effect sizes (−0.48–0.66).
Conclusion
Participation in this pain programme improved both, the PRISM and AMPS scores. The lack of correlation between these assessments in clients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, however, strongly argues for a thorough clinical assessment.
Disclosure statement
We report no other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the team who implemented the BAI-Reha programme: Stefan Bachmann, Gion Caliezi, Barbara Helbling, Stephan Reichenbach, Pia Schärer Huber, Colette Widmer Leu, and Balz Winteler. Additionally for the data collection of this study, we thank Barbara Egender, Hanna Kirchner, Rebeka Marti, Esther Steimen Habegger, and Anita Zogg.