212
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring the biodiversity of key groups in coppice forests (Central Italy): the relationship among vascular plants, epiphytic lichens, and wood-decaying fungi

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 835-846 | Received 10 Dec 2020, Accepted 23 Apr 2021, Published online: 31 May 2021
 

Abstract

Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) indicators consider the main ecological and socioeconomic functions of forests but do not currently include some key groups widely adopted to assess the effects of forest management, such as herbaceous vascular plants, epiphytic lichens, and wood-decay fungi. Moreover, they are shaped into high forests while in the Mediterranean area the oldest type of forest management is coppice. We investigated the diversity and the relationships of the above-mentioned groups of taxa in three European Forest Types (EFTs) to contribute to the selection of indicator species suitable for monitoring Mediterranean coppice forests. We find only a weak cross-taxon congruence between vascular plants and lichens on considering the whole dataset, while no significant correlations are evident within the three EFTs. Species richness was significantly different among EFTs, being Thermophilous deciduous forests the richest, both considering the groups of taxa separately and the total species richness. As for species composition, significant differences were found both for the whole dataset and also for pairwise comparisons among EFTs. We provided a dwelling-species list of the three key groups of taxa, which could be suitable for monitoring the sustainability characteristics of fragmented and low continuity forests such as coppice stands.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the CREA—Forestry Research Centre for the establishment and maintenance of the experimental trials, and Fabio Padovan and Renato Brotzu for the investigations on wood-decaying fungi. We are also greatly indebted to Andrea Cutini, who coordinated the FutureForCoppiceS project. Further we would like to thank the four anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions that helped us to improve this paper.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Luisa Frati: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft.

Giorgio Brunialti: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft.

Sara Landi: Data curation, Investigation, Writing—review & editing.

Rossella Filigheddu: Investigation, Writing—review & editing.

Simonetta Bagella: Project administration, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, review & editing.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

This research is part of a project funded by the LIFE Programme of the European Commission under the Grant Agreement LIFE14 ENV/IT/000514 (LIFE FutureForCoppiceS, “Shaping future forestry for sustainable coppices in Southern Europe: the legacy of past management trials”).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 234.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.