Rose, J., and A. Carr. 2018. “Political Ecologies of Leisure: A Critical Approach to Nature-Society Relations in Leisure Studies.” Annals of Leisure Research.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2018.1428110
When the above article was first published online a reference was inadvertently missed from the second paragraph on page 12 and from the reference list.
The paragraph on page 12 should have read:
Political ecologies of tourism are increasingly asking what nature in tourism is, and moreover, what nature is considered to be, or ought to be, as well as what the effects of these renderings are (Castree 2014). Scholars have begun to interrogate not only the philosophical renderings of tourism and nature, but also the moral dimensions of nature-based tourism (e.g., Caton 2012; Fletcher 2014; Grimwood, Caton, and Cooke 2018; Mostafanezhad and Hannam 2014). Such moral dimensions within tourism question the ways in which tourism practices and ideologies confront a variety of complex sociopolitical questions, all of which also extend beyond tourism. These morality-based issues include questions concerning climate change, resource management, interspecies relations, indigenous rights, production and consumption, claims for quality of life, and standpoints of race, class, gender, and others (Grimwood, Caton, and Cooke 2018). Such moral questions align with perspectives in political ecology because they recognize and interrogate the power dynamics necessarily embedded in historical and contemporary nature-society relations. A political ecology approach to leisure studies invites diverse theoretical and philosophical perspectives to critically review, appraise, and advance dialogue on the moral dimensions of nature and leisure.
This reference should have been included in the reference list:
Grimwood, B., K. Caton, and L. Cooke, eds. 2018. New Moral Natures in Tourism. New York, NY: Routledge.
The authors apologize for these errors.