Maximizing benefits and minimizing impacts: dual-earner couples’ perceived division of household labor decision-making process

ABSTRACT

Researchers have thoroughly documented the various factors that influence couples’ division of household labor. Although numerous approaches have been taken to explain these factors that influence the division of household labor, perceptions of the decision-making process of dividing household labor within a marriage is seldom considered and is therefore the focus of this study. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 heterosexual, dual-earner couples. Data were analyzed with grounded theory methodology. Findings included that couples viewed themselves as first attempting to divide household labor in ways that they perceived as being the most beneficial for them as a couple. When issues arose with a particular task or arrangement, or with the division of labor more generally, they made adjustments intended to minimize the negative impact of those issues. Findings are contextualized within the major theories surrounding quantitative data on household labor (i.e. time availability, relative resources, and gender ideology perspectives). Implications for family researchers, educators, and practitioners are discussed.

KEYWORDS:

• Household labor
• couples
• decision-making
• qualitative
• dyadic
• grounded theory

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.