905
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Representations of parenting and the neo-liberal discourse: parents’ and professionals’ views on child-rearing practices in Italy

ORCID Icon
Pages 188-204 | Received 21 Jul 2020, Accepted 13 Mar 2021, Published online: 24 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

With neoliberal ideologies having inspired social policies for families across the world, the discourse on childrearing as the sole responsibility of individual parents has become dominant. The neologism ‘parenting’ refers more and more to a de-contextualized performance, with targets to be reached, and necessary competences to be learned. Currently, discourse on parenting thus entails what has been defined as ‘parental determinism’ which in turn leads to blaming parents, often described as incompetent and in need of guidance. It is, therefore, not surprising that parents’ voices have seldom been considered and systematically explored. This paper presents a qualitative study, carried out in a northern Italian province, which compared representations of childrearing in different contexts by mothers and fathers, on the one hand, and by practitioners involved in various capacities with parents, on the other. In total, 55 mothers and fathers and 49 professionals were interviewed. The resulting data enabled the identification of common views, as well as clashes in perspectives and instances of parental resistance to dominant discourses on parenting.

Acknowledgements

The data used for this article originate from the project ‘Dynamic patterns of kinship and child-rearing practices in South Tyrol’ financed by the University of Bolzano that I thank for the great opportunity provided. I am grateful to Prof. Lorenz for his support and inspiring suggestions, and to Farida Lardjane, Monika Linser, Nicoletta Trentini who participated in the project. I am also indebted to all the professionals and parents in the advisory board who significantly contributed to the research, and to Valentina Gobbet Bamber who patiently read the paper and helped me significantly with the English editing.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Libera Università di Bolzano: [Grant Number BW2035].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 586.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.