797
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Child sexual abuse prevention – the strategies of protective mothers and fathers: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 927-945 | Received 11 Jan 2021, Accepted 16 Nov 2021, Published online: 20 Dec 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Child sexual abuse (CSA) is an important ongoing public health and criminal problem. Greater awareness in prevention efforts to protect children has been observed typically focussing on schools to teach children protective behaviors. Limited research investigated parental strategies, which means little is known about techniques parents use to protect their children from sexual victimization. Given the paucity of research to understand the current knowledge about parents’ protective behaviors to prevent CSA, the purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize and analyze studies that reported on parental protective strategies. The review addressed the following research question: What are mothers’ and/or fathers’ strategies in preventing/reducing the risk of their children becoming victimized by CSA? Rigor was ensured using the PRISMA framework and the CASP checklist for quality assessment of studies. Our systematic search of peer-reviewed articles resulted in a total of 16 records to be included in the final analysis. Results indicated that mothers and fathers use a variety of measures to protect their children from the risk of CSA. Strategies include educating children about CSA, monitoring and supervising the children, as well as creating a safe environment. The review concluded that parents play an important role in prevention efforts of CSA and their protective behaviors along with concerns about school-based prevention should be recognized and supported. Further studies are urgently needed to examine and evaluate parental protective behaviors including potential differences between maternal and paternal strategies.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs Jan Wood for reviewing earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study. Marika Guggisberg and Jennie Barr were responsible for the conception, grant application and design. Literature search and review including quality assessment, synthesis and analysis of the data were undertaken by Trish Botha and Marika Guggisberg. Material preparation including tables was performed by Marika Guggisberg and Trish Botha in collaboration. Several drafts of the manuscript were written by Marika Guggisberg with all authors being involved in the review of previous versions of the manuscript. After the authors read and approved the final manuscript it was edited by Jan Wood.

Additional information

Funding

This study was financially supported by a grant from CQUniversity [grant number HE2909].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 586.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.