The challenges and needs of male victims of intimate partner violence in Nigeria: what victims and professionals say

ABSTRACT

Historically, interventions have focused on female victims due to intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionate occurrence. Consequently, male victims face significant challenges and unmet needs due to lack of tailored interventions. In under-resourced countries like Nigeria, where male victimization is under-researched and under-documented, the situation is even worse. Using the grounded theory methodology, this study examined the needs and challenges of male victims from the perspective of victims, and professionals who served as key informants. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews from 35 male victims aged ≥18 across 12 states in the southern region of Nigeria, and four professionals were interviewed based on their availability. Data were analysed using content analysis based on category development of the grounded theory method. The challenges and needs identified include balance in the law, need for mental health services, creating a safe space, communal involvement, and victims need to speak up. They were all discussed around an overarching theme of masculinity and societal stereotypes. Re-examination of the existing laws as they apply to male victims, enlightenment campaigns, establishment of tailored institutions or rebranding of existing institution, and creation of support groups were recommended.

KEYWORDS:

• Challenges
• intimate partner violence
• interventions
• male victims
• masculinity
• needs
• societal stereotypes

Acknowledgements

I want to thank professor Tam Hau-Lin Cherry for her continuous support throughout the research process. I thank Professor Choi Wai Man Anna who was also at the beginning of it. Also, I am most grateful to the participants who brave the odds to share their experiences in a highly patriarchal society like Nigeria. I also thank Akintunde, Tosin Yinka, for his support throughout the research process.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).