725
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Economic repercussions of opening the border to labour movements between North and South Cyprus

, &
Pages 729-739 | Received 04 Oct 2013, Accepted 03 Oct 2014, Published online: 24 Nov 2014

Abstract

Recent policy changes in Cyprus represent the first phase of the integration of the labour markets of North and South Cyprus that could eventually lead to the integration of North Cyprus into the EU. Employment of construction workers from the North by South Cyprus has reduced the supply of workers in North Cyprus, while increasing individual incomes. To study the effects on economic well-being and wealth allocation in North Cyprus, a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the economy is employed. Moves to maintain labour market stability by issuing additional permits to workers entering North Cyprus from Turkey are also studied. This policy has significantly benefited all stakeholders in Cyprus.

JEL classification:

1. Introduction

In this article a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model is used to analyse the impact of a number of important labour market changes made by CyprusFootnote1 in the period 2003–2012. This type of CGE analysis is a useful approach for the study of the implications arising from policies bringing labour market integration to countries that are considering entering the EU, or are contemplating policies that would lower barriers to labour movements between two or more states.

For 30 years the border between the communities of North and South Cyprus was closed for the movement of both labour and goods. In April 2003 the border was suddenly opened for the movement of labour (construction workers), though for practical purposes it has remained closed for goods and services. This has led several thousand construction workers to commute daily from the north to jobs in the south.

The current evaluation also includes an examination of the policy of North Cyprus to balance its needs for such skilled labour by issuing additional work permits to allow construction labour from Turkey to work in the north.

The implications of migration and remittances on economic well-being have received increased attention in recent economics literature (Barajas, Chami, Hakura, & Montiel, Citation2011; Ijaz & Aftab, Citation2011). The welfare consequences of immigration policies in which labour heterogeneity and capital mobility are taken into account suggest that additional labour supply increases the welfare of natives in host countries (Borjas, Citation1995; Michael, Citation2006). A number of other researchers (Ottaviano & Peri, Citation2007; Ojeda, Citation2012; Okkerse, Citation2003) have analysed the implications of labour market policy changes, using CGE models, on the economic well-being of countries such as the US, Belgium and Mexico. This article presents the results of a similar CGE model for the economy of North Cyprus that is designed to evaluate in quantitative terms the economic consequences for North Cyprus of labour mobility across the island.

2. Political economy of labour markets in Cyprus

North Cyprus is a small economy that shares the island of Cyprus with the much larger economy (but small in absolute terms) of the Republic of Cyprus (South Cyprus). While North Cyprus is not internationally recognised as a sovereign state, its economy functions in many ways as an independent economic entity. At the same time its governmental fiscal relations are similar to those of a province or state within Turkey.

Such features make the general equilibrium adjustment of North Cyprus an interesting subject for study. As a state within a country it uses the Turkish lira (TL) as its currency and has a completely open capital market. Furthermore, all major currencies (TL, UK pound, euro and US dollar) are freely convertible. The characteristics of the labour market of North Cyprus are unique, but most resemble those of an independent national entity, with control over residency and working status within the territory.

A special feature of the labour market is that the part of the population who can prove that they are ethnically pure Turkish Cypriots (as distinct from being Turkish or being born in North Cyprus with Turkish parents) are treated as EU citizens and face no restrictions on movement and work in any EU country. At the same time there is a subset of these Turkish Cypriots who are in the construction trades and who are allowed to commute daily to work in South Cyprus for higher wages than those available in North Cyprus. These workers serve as a reserve labour force for the construction industry in South Cyprus. They are the last to be hired and the first to be laid off as the economy of South Cyprus expands and contracts. For reasons ranging from discrimination on the demand side to reluctance on the supply side, very few skilled or professional Turkish Cypriots end up working in South Cyprus, although they have been highly successful in pursuing careers almost everywhere else in the world.

At the same time, these skills, and many others, can be supplied in large numbers from Turkey by people who are ready and willing to work on a temporary or extended basis in North Cyprus. This supply of labour is controlled through a system of work permits.

At the present time North Cyprus is attempting to grow rapidly in order to catch up with the level of per capita income enjoyed by the residents of South Cyprus (or at least the level of income that the South enjoyed prior to 2013) and also to prepare itself to be ready to become integrated into the EU. It is pursuing these objectives while trying to retain its cultural identity as a ‘Turkish Cypriot’ nation and not to be overwhelmed in terms of population and culture by immigrant workers (temporary or permanent) from Turkey.

In North Cyprus the supply of savings is not restricted to the amount of domestic savings. There is a large potential flow of savings available and ready to augment domestic savings to finance worthy (and some unworthy) investments. The savings come mainly from Turkey and the UK. In addition, a substantial amount of funds is available from international savers who are looking for a safe haven (or low tax rate) for their savings. In turn, branches of Turkish banks collect savings in North Cyprus that are used to finance investments elsewhere. In North Cyprus the only factor of production that is truly fixed is the supply of land. This constraint is particularly relevant for beach-front land, as tourism is a leading sector in the economy.

The output of the economy is dominated by two specialised service sectors: tourism (including second-home tourism, which is a large component of the demand facing the construction industry) and the higher education sector, which caters largely to students from outside North Cyprus. Hence, changes in policies and economic circumstances that alter the demand for these key internationally traded services supplied by entrepreneurs in North Cyprus will have an immediate impact on the demand and supply of labour and capital in the economy, and will lead to price adjustments for land, which is a major component of the wealth of the title-holders of the land.

3. Methodology and model

In order to study how different economic policy strategies will affect the traditional measures of economic well-being and wealth allocation in North Cyprus, a CGE model is employed. This is designed to be descriptive of the economic relationships it embodies, and the policy options it faces.

From the results of this analysis the immediate economic welfare impacts of this policy change are measured. In addition, consideration is given to whether these policies are likely to enhance or reduce the incentives for an ultimate resolution of the conflict between the interests of the two communities that share the island of Cyprus.

3.1. The CGE model

The CGE model used in the quantitative analysis in this study is the one constructed by Giritli and Ugural (Citation2013). It is similar to the one constructed by Shoven and Whalley (Citation1984) with production-commodity, institution, price and system constraints blocks. A country-specific CGE model is constructed under the constraints that the equilibrium conditions are satisfied through market clearance. Firms are competitive with zero profits, income balances expenditure, and there exists a unique set of equilibrium prices. Furthermore, all agents are assumed to be rational and price takers.

A micro-consistent benchmark data-set in the form of a Social Accounting Matrix, which contains 13 industries, describes the economy. Intermediate goods are used in production according to a Leontief fixed-coefficient function. A three-level nested constant elasticity of substitution (CES) production function with four factors, namely unskilled labour, capital, skilled labour and land, is used to describe the production technology of each sector. These three-level nested production functions allow different elasticities of substitution between the different pairs of factors that are descriptive of the structure of the economy of North Cyprus. Skilled labour, unskilled labour and reproducible capital are assumed to be mobile, but land and natural resources are fixed. The household sector consumes and saves while maximising its utility subject to its income constraint. Investment is financed by the total savings of households, government and the foreign savers who bring their savings to Cyprus.

In this model investment demand in each industry is obtained through a constrained optimisation of the amount of planned investment subject to total savings. Government expenditures are exogenous, tax instruments are endogenous, and the government budget balance is kept fixed. Demand for imported commodities compared with that for their domestically produced counterparts is represented by a CES utility function using the Armington (Citation1969) assumption. Export supply is represented by a constant elasticity of transformation (CET) function.

3.2. Labour market policy change

Following the opening of the borders in 2003 the business community of South Cyprus saw a potential source of supply of skilled construction workers who had several advantages over the temporary foreign workers that they would otherwise employ. The most important of these was that the Turkish Cypriot workers could easily commute daily from their homes in the North to the job sites in the south. This reduced the financial and social costs borne by the employers and residents of South Cyprus that are associated with migrant construction labour from other poorer EU countries that would be inclined to settle permanently in South Cyprus. If the demand for such labour declines and the workers become unemployed, they will expect South Cyprus to assist in alleviating their economic distress. In contrast, for the Turkish Cypriot workers who commute daily to the south, if the demand for their services declines (as has been the case in 2013) then any unemployment problems associated with these workers are exported to North Cyprus. From the perspective of Turkish Cypriots, working in the south represents an opportunity to enjoy substantially higher wage rates without leaving home.

Between 2003 and 2010 the number of Turkish Cypriot construction workers employed in the south’s labour market averaged about 10% of the north’s unskilled labour supply, or about 3000 individuals (Table ). Both the social security records of South Cyprus and the estimates made by Kalimeri, Mullen, and Hatay (Citation2008) yield similar figures for the number of commuting workers. As the recession in South Cyprus became more serious after 2010, the number of Turkish Cypriots employed in the south reduced. However, when the economy of South Cyprus recovers it is expected that a large number of North Cypriot construction workers will once again be employed in the south.

Table 1. Migrant labour movements from and to North Cyprus.

As the Turkish Cypriot workers bring their earnings to the north, this becomes an inflow of external income, and an increase in aggregate demand from the perspective of the economy of North Cyprus. The annual amount of this external income during the period 2003–2011 was approximately 12.5 million TL (in 1998 prices) (Apostolides et al., Citation2011). On the other hand, the tightening of the unskilled labour market in North Cyprus has created an employment opportunity for foreign workers, mainly from Turkey, to come at the prevailing wage rates and satisfy the demand for labour in North Cyprus. These construction workers sourced in Turkey are substituted for the Turkish Cypriot workers who have left the north’s workforce for employment in the south. During the period following 2003 a great deal of investment also flowed into North Cyprus as a result of the improved political climate there. This brought an additional demand for labour, which was also sourced from Turkey. The analysis in this article is focused only on the incremental policies implemented by the Republic of Cyprus to allow Turkish Cypriot workers to be employed in the south. It does not attempt to model the large increase in demand for the construction of tourist homes in North Cyprus after 2004, when the economic uncertainty and political risks of non-nation status were greatly reduced.

3.3. Defining the policy simulations

In the first policy simulation carried out with the CGE model, to assess the economic impacts of the opening up of the South Cyprus labour market to construction workers from North Cyprus, it is assumed that the authorities in North Cyprus authorise just enough workers from Turkey to keep the total workforce in North Cyprus unchanged. Hence, the net shock to the economy of North Cyprus is to experience an increase in expenditure of 12.5 million TL from the income of individuals who now work in the south but live and spend their income in the north. Turkish Cypriot workers in the south are better off working in the south, as their earnings prior to starting work in the south were lower. Thus, no less than 93% reported a significant increase in their pay in the south over previous earnings in the north, the majority reporting up to 25% higher pay (Katircioglu, Lisaniler, Mehmet, & Tahiroglu, Citation2007). In the second policy simulation it is assumed that the number of Turkish workers coming to the north is increased further with the objective of maintaining the same real wage for unskilled labour as that which existed prior to the exodus of the north’s construction labour to the south. The reason for this assumption is that the construction industry in North Cyprus is supplying the new holiday homes that are in demand from foreign residents. In order to maintain their internationally competitive position, the authorities in North Cyprus would prefer there to be no rise in the real wages for construction labour. This is also true for many service industries, such as restaurants, which rely on lower-skilled workers to provide the labour they need.

In general, wages for this type of labour are much higher in North Cyprus than in Turkey. The statistics derived from a special random survey reveal that 39.1% of the guest workers earn 50% higher wages in North Cyprus compared with their previous earnings in Turkey, while a further 25% reported pay that was 25% to 50% higher. In total, 85.1% reported significant pay increases in North Cyprus compared to previous earnings in Turkey (Katircioglu et al., Citation2007). Hence, by changing the number of work permits issued to Turkish workers, the construction labour wage rates in the North can be controlled, since as many workers can be sourced as are needed at the prevailing wage rate.

In addition to the labour mobility and the inflow of income from South Cyprus, there is also a capital inflow into the north as the expansion of aggregate demand creates an increase in the demand for goods and services produced in the north, and hence the derived demand for capital also increases. With the international price of capital fixed to North Cyprus, there is an accommodating supply of foreign savings from abroad. The other factor prices, such as for unskilled labour wages, skilled labour wages and rent, adjust within the model (Table ).

Table 2. Changes in factor prices and changes in price level.

In the first policy simulation it is assumed that the Turkish migrant workers spend all their income in the north. However, this is not a likely scenario. When Turkish workers come to the north and are employed through temporary work permits, most of their families remain in Turkey. As a result, they will transfer approximately half of their earnings back to Turkey. Hence, while there are external inflows of 12.5 million TL from the south to the north, there is also an increase of about 4 million TL of remittance outflows by Turkish workers from the north to Turkey. Together the net positive remittance flow to the economy of the north is about 8.5 million TL. This is the value of the net income flow to the north that is used in the second policy simulation. The same assumption regarding capital flows is maintained.

A third simulation is made which recognises that the Turkish Cypriots working in South Cyprus are also likely to do a significantly greater amount of shopping in the south than they otherwise would. In this scenario it is assumed that they spend 20% of the wages they earn in stores in South Cyprus. This means that the external inflows from the south to the north will be 10 million TL. With the 4 million TL of remittance outflows by Turkish workers from the north to Turkey this will result in a net positive remittance flow to the north of about 6 million TL. Hence, the results of the CGE model simulations of the three labour market scenarios give estimates of their impacts on factor prices, savings and investment, income, factor supplies and output.

4. Results of policy analysis

In the first scenario, the wage rates of unskilled labour in the north increase by 5.62% while the price levels increase by 1.93%, giving a real wage rate increase of 3.69%. The nominal wages of skilled labour increase by 6.39% and land rents increase by 5.85%. In real terms they increased by 4.46% and 3.92%, respectively (Table , columns 1 and 3).The price levels relative to those in Turkey increase by 1.93% for the first policy simulation and 1.30% for the second (Table , row 5). Clearly, both educated skilled labour of all nationalities and the title-holders of land in North Cyprus benefited substantially from the opening up of the labour market of the south. However, the increase in the real wage rates of unskilled labour would no doubt elicit protests from the north’s construction firms and restaurant owners, who would ask for a relaxation of the number of work permits issued to workers from Turkey.

The results of the simulations for the second scenario indicate that in order to maintain the same real unskilled labour wage, additional work permits must be issued over and above the initial level of 10% of the labour force. This additional migrant labour to maintain real wage stability is estimated to be equal to 3.2% of the unskilled labour force, or 32% of the workers who chose to find work in the south. In both of the scenarios the results of the CGE model simulation indicate that the stimulation of capital inflows would increase the capital stock by 2.74%.

The final results of the simulations for these labour market policy changes made by the governments of South and North Cyprus indicate that they increased the real wages of skilled workers by 4.12%, while real land rents increased by 3.78% (Table , column 2).

The results of the third scenario indicate that in order to maintain the same real unskilled labour wage, fewer additional work permits must be issued than in the second scenario in order to maintain real wage stability. In this case it is estimated that additional permits equivalent to only 2.2% of the unskilled labour force will be required. In this scenario the results of the CGE model simulation indicate that the stimulation of capital inflows would increase the capital stock by 1.91%.

The final results of the simulations for these labour market policy changes made by the governments of South and North Cyprus indicate that they increased the real wages of skilled workers by 2.92%, while real land rents increased by 2.64% (Table , column 6).

Overall it can be seen that the combined policy changes of South and North Cyprus have been highly beneficial to Turkish Cypriots and to workers from Turkey, who have enjoyed a substantially higher wage rate in North Cyprus than the one in Turkey. The gains for those who chose to work in the south are obvious, but skilled workers in the north have also enjoyed an increase in their real wages. In the case of the second scenario, with an increase in the real wage rate of skilled workers of 4.12, the value of the wage bill increased the annual incomes of skilled workers in the north by about 13 million TL. In the third scenario, the increase in the incomes of the skilled workers would be 9.4 million TL. In aggregate, the gain by skilled workers through the increase in their total wage compensation was greater than the total increase in wages enjoyed by the entire cohort of Turkish Cypriot construction workers who found employment in South Cyprus.

The use and ownership of land in North Cyprus that prior to 1974 was owned by Greek Cypriots is a highly contentious issue. However, it is clear that the value of this land has been enhanced by these policies. The main beneficiaries of the increase in land prices are the citizens of North Cyprus and other countries such as Turkey, the UK and the rest of Europe who own properties in the North. If there was a settlement between the two parts of Cyprus, to the degree that Turkish Cypriots were required to give up their current right to the use or sale of this land, these individuals would have more to lose from such a settlement (Gurel & Ozersay, Citation2006; Mullen, Orphanides, & Platis, Citation2006). Consider a situation in which the value of land in North Cyprus is worth 10 billion US dollars. If the real annual rate of return on such land were 2%, the annualised increase in the return on the land of between 2.64 and 3.78% would be equal to approximately US$7 million and US$7.5 million. As this value will be capitalised into the price of land, a much larger increase in land prices would be expected.Footnote2

Finally, another very contentious issue in the negotiations for reconciliation between the north and the south is the number of former residents of Turkey who now live and work in North Cyprus. The results of this analysis show that the effects of these policy changes by South Cyprus have unambiguously increased this obstacle to the ultimate political reconciliation of the two divisions of Cyprus by encouraging more workers from Turkey to come to North Cyprus to work and perhaps settle in the north.

4.1. Macro-economic impacts

The overall positive impacts of these policies on North Cyprus are transferred to the estimated impact on the macro-economic variables of North Cyprus. The economic impacts of the simulations are shown in Table . The estimated percentage increase in real GDP is 0.78% and 1.25% respectively for the first two simulations. If the second simulation is taken to be descriptive of the policies of the two governments (Table , column 4), in this case it is found that real investment in the north increased by 2.51%, and the real value of consumption increased by 4.3% (Table , column 4, row 4). Real tax revenues increased by 5.11%, while real public expenditure increased by 3.78%. (Table , column 4, row 6, 7). Total real savings in the economy grew by 3.34%, while the private component of this total increased by 9.89% in real terms.

Table 3. Nominal and real impacts on key macro-economic variables by simulation.

In this case it is found that real investment in the north increased by 1.73%, and the real value of consumption increased by 3.01% (Table , column 6, row 4). Real tax revenues increased by 3.51%, while real public expenditure increased by 2.66% (Table , column 6, row 6, 7). Total real savings in the economy grew by 2.25%, while the private component of this total increased by 6.85% in real terms.

All these results from the CGE model appear entirely reasonable, given the expected general equilibrium responses to this labour market shock.

5. Conclusions and implications for further integration of the economies of North and South Cyprus

All the results of this study point to the fact that the opening of the South Cyprus labour market to construction workers from the north has produced very substantial benefits for the economy of North Cyprus. The impacts were positive in all respects, since North Cyprus in turn has gained access to a large pool of such labour from Turkey that it is able to source on a temporary basis. The close cultural and economic ties between North Cyprus and Turkey enable this flow of labour to enter and exit North Cyprus with the minimum of disruption to the economy. Furthermore, the situation allows South Cyprus to export some of the unemployment that arises indirectly to Turkey in the construction labour market (for example, during the crash in the economy of South Cyprus in 2013). Because of the huge size of the construction labour force in Turkey and the fact that the Turkish workers coming to North Cyprus are sourced from a wide geographical area, the disruption caused by such labour movements to the labour market in Turkey is minimal.

These policy simulations highlight a number of features of the present labour market policies on the island of Cyprus that might be considered in the evolution of market policies. First, the increased integration of the labour market for Greek and Turkish Cypriots benefits both communities. Second, allowing North Cyprus, through work permits, to control the volume of labour entering the north allows it to stabilise its labour market conditions so that a severe recession in North or South Cyprus is absorbed to a large extent by reducing the number of temporary workers in the north from Turkey. This is a policy instrument that North Cyprus would lose if both North Cyprus and Turkey were to enter the EU.

Third, to the extent that the integration of the labour markets improves the economic situation in the north, it can be expected that land prices in the north will increase. While such an outcome will increase the wealth of the north’s landowners, it also will make them less willing to accept a settlement between the two communities that would foresee significant transfers of land back to their original Greek Cypriot owners. Lastly, while the relatively easy flow of labour at all skill levels between Turkey and North Cyprus is of great economic benefit for both Greek and Turkish Cypriots, it is likely that a greater stock of Turkish workers and eventually their families will reside in the north.

This development over time means that both Greek and Turkish Cypriots are likely to experience a greater cultural penetration of Turkey, well after the Turkish army leaves the island. Of course, this is not a unique experience within the EU, which has as one of its foundations a policy allowing the free movement of people. Furthermore, as Turkish Cypriot citizens in North Cyprus, where there is a strong university system, achieve higher levels of education, they too can be expected to move from the island to seek better prospects elsewhere. Under EU conditions it would be completely natural for this labour void to be filled by people from a similar culture who reside only a few hundred kilometres away and are seeking higher incomes.

Notes

1. Republic of Cyprus is the recognised international legal entity responsible for the Island of Cyprus. However, since the end of a long-running civil war in 1974, the two communities, Greek and Turkish, have for practical purposes been administered separately by two independently democratically elected governments referred to here as South Cyprus and North Cyprus.

2. According to Mullen et al. (Citation2006), land values from 2003 to 2006 in North Cyprus increased by 416%. This was a result of many economic and political changes that occurred in Cyprus at that time, not only the relaxing of borders that applied to commuting workers.

References

  • Apostolides, C., Apostolides, A., Eminer, F., Guryay, E., Loizou, L. M., Ozyigit, A., Safakli, O. V. (2011). Assessment of current economic interdependence between the Greek cypriot an the Turkish cypriot communities and recommendations for reinforced economic convergence. ( Economic Interdependence in Cyprus, Report ‘A’). Nicosia: Peace Economics Consortium
  • Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers, 16, 170–201.
  • Barajas, A., Chami, R., Hakura, D., & Montiel, P. (2011). Workers’ remittances and the equilibrium real exchange rate, theory and evidence. Economia, 11, 45–99.
  • Borjas, G. J. (1995). The economic benefits from immigration. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 3–22.10.1257/jep.9.2.3
  • Giritli, N., & Ugural, S. (2013). Implications of exogenous income shock on economic well-being in North Cyprus: CGE model approach. Actual Problems of Economics, 8, 243–256.
  • Gurel, A., & Ozersay, K. (2006). The politics of property in Cyprus. Conflicting appeals to ‘Bizonality’ and ‘Human Rights’ by the two cypriot communities ( Report No. 3/2006). PRIO. Nicosia: Peace Research Institute Oslo.
  • Ijaz, Z., & Aftab, K. (2011). Welfare impact analysis of labour emigration and workers’ remittances – A case study of Pakistan. Inter-disciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2, 936–946.
  • Kalimeri, J., Mullen, F., & Hatay, M. (2008). Intra-island trade in Cyprus, obstacles, oppositions and psychological barriers (PRIO Paper). Nicosia: Peace Research Institute Oslo.
  • Katircioglu, S., Lisaniler, F. G., Mehmet, O., & Tahiroglu, M. (2007). Labor mobility and labor market convergence in Cyprus. Turkish Studies, 8, 45–69.
  • Michael, M. S. (2006). Are migration policies that induce skilled (unskilled) migration beneficial (harmful) for the host country? ( Working Paper No. 1814). CESifo. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute.
  • Mullen, F., Orphanides, S., & Platis, S. (2006). The property regime in a Cyprus settlement. A reassessment of the solution proposed under the annan plan, given the performance of the property markets in Cyprus, 2003–2006 (Report No. 2/2006). PRIO. Nicosia: Peace Research Institute Oslo.
  • Ojeda, R. H. (2012). The economic benefits of comprehensive immigration reform. Cato Journal, 32, 175–199.
  • Okkerse, L. (2003). Effects of migration: An applied general equilibrium analysis for Belgium. ( Paper No. 015). University of Antwerp, Antwerp: Department of Economic Research.
  • Ottaviano, G., & Peri, G. (2007). The effects of immigration on U.S. Wages and rents: A general equilibrium approach ( Discussion Paper No. 13/07). CReAM. London: Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration.
  • Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 1007–1051.