Abstract
The article argues that a systematic study of mediatization processes promises valuable insights into problems of European Union (EU) governance. It sets out the mediatization argument and explores to what extent the political system and its major components can be expected to adjust to the logics of the news media. The empirical focus is on the adjustments of the European Commission to six distinct logics of the news media: news values, agenda-setting, news production, news language, investigative/accusatory journalism, and the reciprocal effects of professionalization. The paper finds preliminary evidence of mostly low to moderate mediatization across these six dimensions. Four main moderating factors account for this finding: political disincentives to strive for mass publicity, difficulties of communicating to fragmented audiences, limited scope for legislative initiatives, and the technocratic drawn-out nature of the EU policy process.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is grateful to three anonymous referees for their comments on a previous version of this paper. He would also like to thank Sebastian Kurpas (formerly of CEPS, now the EU Commission) and Michael Brüggemann (Jacobs University, Bremen) for working with me on studies in this area. All remaining errors in this article are mine, not theirs.