1,593
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Taking the lead: informal division of labour in the EU's external environmental policy-making

Pages 113-131 | Published online: 25 Jun 2012
 

Abstract

The article examines the informal division of labour in the European Union's (EU's) external environmental policy-making. It focuses on informal arrangements in the EU co-ordination and representation processes with regard to the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and international climate negotiations. Whereas the rotating Presidency is formally in charge of leading the internal EU co-ordination and representing the EU externally, we see that in practice an informal system is used, in which member states and Commission officials informally ‘take the lead’. Based upon new-institutionalist insights, this article argues that four functional reasons explain the informality in the EU's external environmental policy-making: burden sharing; expertise pooling; involving member states; and guaranteeing continuity. Moreover, once the informal arrangement is in place, actors in the EU keep using it because they act path-dependently and because it is considered the most appropriate way to act in many international environmental negotiations.

Notes

We interviewed 10 member state representatives, three Commission officials and two officials working at the Council Secretariat. Six of these interviewees have performed a lead country, lead negotiator or issue leader task in the CSD or climate negotiations between 2008 and 2009. The interviews were conducted in Brussels between May 2009 and March 2010.

Moreover, a lead country system, similar to the one used in CSD negotiations, has also been applied during the final negotiation stages leading to the Stockholm Convention (Delreux Citation2011: 114–15).

Those were sub-clusters on: (1) agriculture, land and rural development; (2) drought and desertification; (3) Africa; (4) cross-cutting issues and interlinkages; and (5) water (for the review of the CSD-13 water and sanitation decisions).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 248.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.