259
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Community’s forest dependency and its effects towards the forest resources and wildlife abundances in Sarawak, Malaysia

, &
Pages 401-412 | Received 23 Mar 2015, Accepted 06 Jul 2015, Published online: 20 Aug 2015
 

Abstract

Forests play an important role in the community’s livelihood, and this role has created an important relationship or mutual dependence between the forest and the community. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the types of community’s forest dependency and to identify the effects of community’s forest dependency towards forest resources and wildlife abundance. The data were collected using the self-administered questionnaire, involving 204 community members in Bau District, Sarawak. The results show that the common types of forest dependency are private land ownership, land area of less than 10 acres, less than 50 meters of house distance to forest, land utilization for house site and agriculture purposes, and estimated income and expenditure of less than RM 1000. The land use–paddy field, forest resources–handicraft and forest resources–water source significantly predict the abundance of forest cover. The land use–house site, house distance to forest and forest resources–hunting significantly predict the wildlife abundance. The forest resources–house material and forest resources–water source significantly predict the water source quality. The community’s forest dependency needs to be revisited to further understand the community’s needs and how this dependency can be made more sustainable, while less destructing the forest. Hence, a sustainable framework involving all stakeholders is needed to manage the community’s forest dependency.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the community members in Bau District for their cooperation in completing this study. We also would like to thank Bau District Office, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) and other relevant authorities for permitting us to conduct this research as well as assisting us with data and relevant logistical support. Last but not least, we would like to acknowledge the comments and critics made by the anonymous reviewers that greatly improved the quality of this paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Rufford Small Grants for Nature Conservation by The Rufford Foundation [13988-1].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 235.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.