775
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Policy support for rural economic development based on Holling’s ecological concept of panarchy

, &
Pages 1-14 | Received 03 Jun 2015, Accepted 28 Sep 2015, Published online: 30 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

Globally, rural regions are searching for innovative growth opportunities to reinvigorate their economies. This paper examines the redevelopment of rural communities through an ecological lens – based on the notion of continuous cycles of adaptive change within complex systems as first identified within Holling’s concept of panarchy. Panarchy suggests that complex systems have more than a single equilibrium point and, instead, have some inherent resiliency based on the notion of multiple stable regimes. As such, panarchy provides a conceptual model that describes the ways in which complex social and ecological systems are organized and structured both spatially and temporally. By drawing parallels between the characteristics of ecological communities and rural economic systems, a novel framework is developed to assist policy-makers reflect on a rural community’s position along its own adaptive change cycle and, then, implement appropriate inventions to improve system resiliency – which in this case is linked with economic resiliency through development and/or growth. Supported by empirical data emerging from both key informant interviews and content analysis of current rural development policy, this work also identifies leverage points where policy intervention may be most advantageous by specifying the timing of policy instruments on the cycle. Specifically, this framework describes four leverage points, three major and one minor, to help push or pull rural regions into an area of higher resilience.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the 12 economic development officials from the four Atlantic Canada provinces who participated in this study. We appreciate the time they took to participate in interviews and the thoughtful and knowledgeable answers they provided.

Additional information

Funding

This study is supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council graduate scholarship to principal investigator, Penny Slight. Additional funds to support the analysis and dissemination of this research were provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [grant number 605-2010-0015] to Dr Michelle Adams. This study was undertaken with oversight and approval from Dalhousie University’s Social Science and Humanities Research Ethics Board, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 235.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.