Regional differences in China’s ecological civilization construction from an evolutionary perspective and the influencing factors

ABSTRACT

As the global economy, society, and environment are undergoing profound changes and the realization of sustainable development has become the common aspiration of the international community, ecological civilization construction has become an increasingly important issue for China to formulate its long-term development strategies and promote modernization. This study analyzes the characterization of 655 established pilot zones of ecological civilization construction and ‘clear waters and green mountains are as valuable as mountains of gold and silver’ innovative practices from 2017 to 2022. The spatial distribution of ecological civilization areas in China follows a pattern where more regions are in the southeast than in the northwest (Hu Line). The focus of China’s comprehensive ecological civilization construction has been towards the southwest in the first year and has subsequently shifted towards the northwest. The overall Gini coefficient decreased from 0.494 to 0.299, and regional ecological civilization disparities gradually narrowed. Currently, regional construction disparities between the eastern and western regions are a major obstacle to balanced development; therefore, promoting coordinated regional development is necessary. Various factors affecting the pattern of ecological civilization construction, including natural resources, economic development, social progress, policies, and culture, were identified. The availability of natural resources and economic development cause regional differences in construction levels. This research will help promote the coordinated development of Chinese ecological civilization, while the development experiences of different regions can also provide guidance for sustainable development in developing countries.

KEYWORDS:

• Ecological civilization
• regional differences
• evolutionary perspective
• influencing factors
• China

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the grant from the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number:19CGL070) and Shandong Higher Education ‘Youth Innovation Science and Technology Support Program’(Grant Number:2021RW042) and Shandong Natural Science Foundation General Project(Grant Number:ZR2023MD126) and Special Fund of Taishan Scholar Project (Grant Number:tsqn202306240).