179
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The effect of religious piety on managerial entrenchment: evidence from entrenched boards of directors

, &
Pages 1417-1422 | Published online: 25 Jan 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Prior research shows that religious piety is linked to honesty and risk-aversion. Religious piety alleviates the agency conflict by lessening the motivation for managers to exploit shareholders. Because of its role in mitigating the agency conflict, we argue that religious piety influences corporate governance arrangements. We exploit the variation in religious piety across U.S. counties and show that religious piety significantly influences the probability that a firm has an entrenched (staggered) board of directors. In particular, firms located in an area with stronger religious piety are significantly less likely to have a staggered board. This negative effect, however, is significant only when the degree of religiosity is higher than a certain threshold. Further analysis reveals that our results are unlikely confounded by endogeneity. Our results are especially interesting as they demonstrate that non-financial attributes, such as religious piety, has a significant influence on one of the most crucial governance mechanisms, i.e. the board of directors.

JEL CLASSIFICATION:

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Prior studies show that firms located in more religious areas exhibit stronger risk-aversion and more conservative investment policies (Hilary and Hui Citation2009), less opportunistic timing of option grants (Grullon, Kanatas, and Weston Citation2010), less earnings management (Grullon, Kanatas, and Weston Citation2010; McGuire, Omer, and Sharp Citation2012), fewer class action lawsuits (Grullon, Kanatas, and Weston Citation2010), fewer financial restatements and financial reporting irregularities (Dyreng, Mayhew, and Williams Citation2012; McGuire, Omer, and Sharp Citation2012).

2 One issue with this approach is that COMPUSTAT reports only the current state and county of the headquarters. So, the location data do not capture firm relocations. This potential problem, however, is not expected to be severe because relocations are quite rare. To put it in perspective, Pirinsky and Wang (Citation2006) find that only 118 firms relocate in a sample of over 5,000 firms over 15 years (about 2.36%). Moreover, whereas the magnitude of the measurement error might be correlated with some of the dependent variables, it is unlikely that this would be the case for the direction of the measurement error (Hilary and Hui Citation2009).

3 After 2006, Risk Metrics changed the way governance data were collected. For consistency, we finish our sample period in 2006.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 205.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.