390
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Can environmental tax curb air pollution: evidence from China

ORCID Icon
Pages 1449-1452 | Published online: 05 Apr 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Using the environmental tax reform implemented in 2018 in China as a quasi-experiment, this paper employs PSM, DID, and DDD methods to investigate the causal impact of environmental tax on air pollution. Viewing those provinces that choose to set a higher tax rate than the original pollution fee rate as the treatment group and provinces that do not increase the tax rate as the control group, this paper provides robust evidence that the environmental tax reform is effective in reducing PM2.5 and SO2 concentration level, while the effect is smaller and inconsistent for NO2. A back-of-the-envelope welfare analysis suggests that a 1-unit increase in the environmental tax rate is associated with a reduction of 5,616 in total deaths and a welfare gain of $28.256 billion in 2005 USD for all Chinese households.

JEL CLASSIFICATION:

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Notes

1 See https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/china/2015/04/150401_china_9_cities_environmentnt for details (in Chinese), accessed on 1 March 2022.

2 The results are available upon request.

3 The CSMAR database only provides information on industrial SO2 emissions, while city-level data on industrial NO2 emissions is not available. Therefore, I am only able to use SO2 emissions as the intensity variable.

4 The BSPC areas tend to experience more air pollution regulations starting from June 2018. For more information about the BSPC, please visit http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/03/content_5303158.htm (in Chinese), accessed on 1 March 2022. A brief description is also available upon request.

5 The correlation coefficient between SO2 and NO2 in 2017 is 0.5.

6 I also perform a heterogeneity analysis by comparing the BSPC areas and non-BSPC areas and using both the DID and DDD specifications and find that the effect of the environmental tax is more significant for the non-BSPC areas. The results are available upon request.

7 The process of welfare analysis is available upon request.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 205.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.