ABSTRACT
A widely adopted measure of housing affordability is that households should spend no more than 30% of their household income on housing. However, this normative threshold is an arbitrary Great Depression-era guideline and may not be relevant today. This paper proposes a subjective indicator of housing affordability by introducing a method commonly used in the medical sciences. It utilizes discrete information to estimate a subjective affordability ratio that discriminates between subjective house-poor and non-house-poor households. We apply the proposed method to household-level data collected in Selangor, Malaysia, and show that the optimal cut-off point is 23.5%. This estimated value suggests a higher prevalence of house-poor households than is implied by the regularly assumed 30% threshold. In addition, we perform a sensitivity analysis and find the bias in the estimated cut-off point is close to zero.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Ethical approval
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Monash University Human Ethics Committee (Project ID: 31276).
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2023.2208833.
Notes
1 Selangor is one of Malaysia’s highly developed states with the largest urban population of 6.7 million. This translates into an urbanization rate of 95.8%. Selangor’s median house price as of Q2 2022 is RM430,000, the third most expensive state in the country (NAPIC Citation2022).
2 ‘House-poor’ households refer to households that perceive their housing costs to be a financial burden and hence, unaffordable.