444
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SECTION I: NEURAL AND COMPUTATIONAL APPROACHES TO OWN- AND OTHER-RACE FACE PROCESSING

Computational perspectives on the other-race effect

&
Pages 1121-1137 | Received 30 Apr 2013, Accepted 04 May 2013, Published online: 14 Jun 2013
 

Abstract

Psychological studies have long shown that human memory is superior for faces of our own-race than for faces of other-races. In this paper, we review computational studies of own- versus other-race face processing. Computational models examine the visual challenges of representing the uniqueness of individual faces that vary both within and across demographic categories. These models isolate the visual components of the other-race effect and provide an objective control for socioaffective responses to other-race faces. This control allows researchers to compare and test the role of experience/contact in the other-race effect, using various operational definitions of this theoretical construct. The models show that to produce an other-race effect computationally, biased experience or learning must intervene during the process of feature selection. This implicates the critical importance of “developmental” learning in the other-race effect.

Thanks are due to funding from the Technical Support Working Group of the Department of Defense, which supported the authors in preparing this paper. Thanks are also due to Allyson Rice and two anonymous reviewers for comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Thanks are due to funding from the Technical Support Working Group of the Department of Defense, which supported the authors in preparing this paper. Thanks are also due to Allyson Rice and two anonymous reviewers for comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Notes

1 Jonathon Phillips was the organizer of the FERET test and so the controls were implemented as baseline algorithms against which the others could be compared.

2 We assume this will be covered in detail by Anzures et al. (this issue 2013).

3 Combining was done by rescaling the scores from the different algorithms and averaging them.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 238.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.