![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
Abstract
In an attempt to further integrate visual source material into the historical discipline, this contribution analyses four commemorative monuments that the British House of Commons established in London's Westminster Abbey and St Paul's Cathedral during the war years with Revolutionary and Napoleonic France. By deconstructing the narrative on display in both pantheons this paper will argue that rather than exemplifying Britishness these memorials reflected the interests of the commissioning political elite. Desirous to defend itself against an emerging middle class that manifested itself with ever more fervency in the economic, political and no less cultural arena, Parliament resorted to a host of barriers that impeded popular access to the visual narrative. Through the eclectic selection of exemplary men, the monuments' sophisticated iconography and the reluctance to forge medial representations the Commons prevented its patriotism from appealing to the entire British nation in arms. Halfway through the Sattelzeit the supposedly ‘national pantheon’ was turned into a confined space for mediating an elite-based narrative of history.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the Conway Library, London, for allowing me to reproduce from their photographic collection the images of some monuments discussed in this article.
Notes
1. CitationCarlyle, On Heroes, 1.
2. CitationHunt, The New Cultural History, 2.
3. CitationBurke, What is Cultural History?, 18; CitationPedersen, “What is Political History Now?,” 42.
4. CitationColley, Britons; CitationHoock, “The British Military Pantheon”; CitationYarrington, The Commemoration of the Hero.
5. CitationBourdieu, “Propos sur le Champ Politique.”
6. CitationGeertz, “Centers, Kings, and Charisma,” 124.
7. CitationGombrich, Aby Warburg, 13.
8. CitationFrevert, “Neue Politikgeschichte,” 26. For citation of Schmitt: CitationGombrich, Aby Warburg, 14.
9. CitationTurner, Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors, 13.
10. CitationCassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Vol. 3, 235.
11. CitationVon der Dunk, In het Huis van de Herinnering, 65.
12. CitationGombrich, Art and Illusion, 196.
13. CitationStone and Fawtier-Stone, An Open Elite?.
14. CitationSolkin, Painting for Money, 276.
15. CitationNewman, The Rise of English Nationalism; CitationColley, Britons, 131.
16. CitationLangford, A Polite and Commercial People, 700.
17. CitationColley, “The Apotheosis of George III,” 111.
18. CitationGoldsmith, “Citizen of the World,” 177.
19. CitationAlvarez Espriella, Letters from England, 149.
20. Entry (July 9, 1810). In Citation The Diary of Benjamin Robert Haydon , Vol. 1, 176.
21. CitationPenny, “The Whig Cult of Fox in Early Nineteenth-Century Sculpture,” 94.
22. Entry ‘Thomas Dundas’. In Citation Oxford Dictionary of National Biography , Vol. 17, 295.
23. Various officers to Colonel Blundell, successor to Dundas as governor of Guadeloupe (June 3, 1794), in: British Library Add. Mss 39791 (Flaxman Papers XII) Fol. 1.
24. CitationHoock, “The British Military Pantheon in St Paul's Cathedral,” 91.
25. Monthly Magazine (April 21, 1806).
26. CitationHilton, A Mad, Bad, and Dangerous People?, 62.
27. Monthly Magazine (April 1806).
28. CitationBrewer, The Pleasures of the Imagination, 96.
29. William Windham to Thomas Amyot (March 3, 1804). In Citation The Windham Papers . Vol. 2, 231.
30. Citation Westminster Abbey Guide , 89.
31. The difference between the Pitt and the Chatham may result from Pitt's continued political participation at the time of his death, a fact that was bound to influence the memorial's connotations.
32. Session (January 27, 1806). In Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 5, 41–73.
33. The Gentleman's Magazine (August 1813).
34. I would like to thank the anonymous reader of the European Review of History for bringing this point to my attention.
35. CitationHilton, A Mad, Bad and Dangerous People?, 218.
36. CitationColley, Britons, 120; CitationCookson, The British Armed Nation, 126.
37. CitationCookson, The British Armed Nation, 159.
38. Session (November 14, 1814). In Journals of the House of Commons, Vol. 70, 12.
39. CitationColley, “The Apotheosis of George III,” 95.
40. CitationBurke, Reflections, 85.
41. CitationClark, English Society; CitationColley, “The Apotheosis of George III”; CitationLangford, A Polite and Commercial People; CitationNewman, The Rise of English Nationalism.
42. Joseph Addison, in The Spectator 26 (1711): 109.
43. CitationHaskell, History and its Images, 7.
44. CitationBurke, Eyewitnessing, 48.
45. CitationBolingbroke, “Letter 2: Concerning the True Use and Advantages of the Study of History,” 7.
46. CitationYarrington, The Commemoration of the Hero, 167–216.