The Arms Control Challenges of Nanotechnology

Abstract

The military potential of nanotechnology was anticipated by its proponents from the early stages of its development, and explicit programmes for this purpose are now well established. However, the impact of nanotechnology on arms control is very unlikely to be merely additive. Instead, it threatens to undermine the arms control paradigm, for reasons explored in this paper. These include the place of nanoscience and nanotechnology as the principal enablers of technological convergence; the extension from dual-use to multiple-use dilemmas arising from new materials and processes, and their integration into economic development and competitiveness; low entry-level infrastructural requirements (already a feature of biotechnology); and a blurring of the distinction between offensive arms and capabilities likely to be viewed as threatening.

ACKNIOWLEDGEMENTS

I am grateful to Neil Cooper for his helpful and constructive critique of an earlier version of this paper.

Notes

Michael Moodie, Dangerous weapons in dangerous hands: responding to the challenges of chemical and biological terrorism (IFRI Security Studies Center, 2009), at: www.ifri.org/downloads/PP28_Moodie_Summer2009.pdf

Brian Rappert and Chandré Gould (eds), Biosecurity: Origins, Transformations and Practices (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009).

Kerry Boyd-Anderson, ‘U.S. Creates Advisory Board for Biosecurity’, Arms Control Association, April 2004, at: http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_04/Biosecurity

Mark Wheelis and Malcolm Dando, ‘Neurobiology: A case study of the imminent militarization of biology’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 859 (September 2005), p.560.

Malcolm Dando, Preventing Biological Warfare: The Failure of American Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).

Stuart Croft, Strategies of Arms Control: A History and Typology (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996).

Neil Davison, ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009).

Geneva Call, ‘Engaging Armed Non-State Actors in a Landmine Ban: The Geneva Call Progress Report’ (2000–2007), at: http://www.genevacall.org/resources/conference-reports/pre/gc-2000-24mar-geneva.pdf

Matthew Meselson, ‘Averting The Hostile Exploitation of Biotechnology’, Chemical and Biological Weapons Convention Bulletin, Vol.48 (June 2000), p.16.

Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons (Protocol IV to the 1980 Convention), 13 October 1995,at: http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/INTRO/570?OpenDocument

The Royal Society, Science Issues, available at: http://royalsociety.org/landing.asp?id=1210

‘At the level of an individual molecule, the interplays of mechanical and electronical behavior and chemical properties manifest themselves in an unusually clear manner […] revealing the crucial role of thermal, stochastic, and quantum-tunneling processes…’ James K. Gimzewski and Christian Joachim, ‘Nanoscale Science of Single Molecules Using Local Probes’, Science, Vol. 283, No. 5408 (12 March 1999), p.1683.

The Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (London: The Royal Society, July 2004), p.9.

Quoted in ‘US NanoMetro Map’, The Project on Emerging Technologies, at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/map/

Cheryl Pellerin, ‘Economic Development Organization Forms Nanotechnology Unit’, America.gov, 5 June 2007, at: http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2007/June/20070605115222lcnirellep0.8191492.html

See the inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products currently on the market compiled by The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/

John Teresko, ‘Get Ready for the Age of Nanotechnology’, Forbes.com, 2 October 2003, at: http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/02/1002nanotechnologypinnacor.html

Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, ‘National Nanotechnology Initiative: Leading to the Next Industrial Revolution’, a report by the Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology, p.24, at: http://clinton4.nara.gov/media/pdf/nni.pdf; see also the subsequent report: Committee for the Review of the National nanotechnology Initiative, National Research Council, Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: A Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002).

For the range of thinking and planning inspired by the converging technologies prospect in the US and EU respectively, see: US National Science Foundation/Department of Commerce-sponsored Report, M. C. Roco, and William Sims Bainbridge (eds), Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (2002), at: http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/; Alfred Nordmann (Rapporteur), Converging Technologies – Shaping the Future of European Societies (2004), at: http://www.ntnu.no/2020/pdf/final_report_en.pdf. See also William Sims Bainbridge, Nanoconvergence: The Unity of nanoscience, Biotechnology, Information technology and Cognitive Science (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2007).

Roco and Bainbridge, Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance (note 19), p.39.

Ibid., p.14.

Nordmann, Converging Technologies (note 19), p.4.

See for example, ‘Examples of nationally sponsored nanoscale technology development centers’, Table 3.3, in Committee for the Review of the National nanotechnology Initiative, National Research Council, Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers (note 18), pp.29–30.

M.C. Roco, ‘National Nanotechnology Initiative – Past, Present, Future’, February 2006, p.9, at: http://france-science.org/IMG/pdf/MCR_07-0101_NNI.Past.Present.Future_updateTables.pdf (Italics original).

See for example, Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, ‘Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology’, November 2008, at: http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm74/7468/7468.pdf; Gerhard Banse et al. (eds), Assessing Societal Implications of Converging Technological Development (Berlin: Edition Sigma, 2007); Fritz Allhoff et al. (eds), Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2007).

Nordmann, Converging Technologies (note 19), p.3 (Italics added).

M. C. Roco, ‘National Nanotechnology Initiative’ (note 24), p.31.

Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, ‘Novel Materials in the Environment’ (note 25), p.6.

See for example, ‘Where is China in the Nanotechnology Race?’, Azo Nanotechnology, 1 February 2007, at: http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=3649; Chris Peterson, ‘Nanotechnology Race: MITI Adopts “Bottom-Up” Strategy’, Foresight Institute, Fresight Update 12, at: http://www.foresight.org/Updates/Update12/Update12.1.htm

Physorg.com, ‘Nanotechnology in China is focusing on innovations and new products’, Physorg.com, 2005, at: http://www.physorg.com/news5870.html

Chris Toumey, ‘Nano Hyperbole and Lessons from Earlier Technologies’, Nanotechnology Law and Business, Vol. 1., No. 4 (2004), pp.397–405; Naomi Lubick, ‘Spoonful of caution with the Nano Hype’, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 41, No. 8 (April 2007), pp.2661–5; ‘Beyond the nanohype’, Economist, Vol. 366, No. 8315 (March 2003), special section, pp.23–26.

Jim Whitman, ‘The Challenge to Deliberative Systems of Technological Systems Convergence’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 4 (December 2007), pp.329–42.

The Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies (note 13), p.5.

For a review of military nanotechnology developments by state, see Jürgen Altmann, Military Nanotechnology: Potential Applications and Preventive Arms Control (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006), pp.38–70.

Director, Defense Research and Engineering, Department of Defense, Defense Nanotechnology Research and Development Programs (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 17 May 2005), at: http://www.nano.gov/html/res/DefenseNano2005.pdf

Altmann, Military Nanotechnology (note 34), chapters 3 and 4. More generally and speculatively: Chris Phoenix, Thirty Essential Studies, (Center for Responsible Nanotechnology), at: http://www.crnano.org/Top%2030.pdf

Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, ‘Novel Materials in the Environment’ (note 25), p.6

Roco and Sims Bainbridge (eds), Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance (note 19), p.3.

Seumas Millerand Michael J. Selgelid, Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences (Guildford: Springer, 2008).

This is not a novel issue: see Tor Egil Frland, Cold Economic Warfare: CoCom and the Forging of Strategic Export Controls (Dordrecht: Republic of Letters, 2010).

Nordmann, Converging Technologies (note 19), p.37.

National Nanotechnology Initiative (US), 2006, at: http://www.nano.gov/html/research/home_research.html

Altmann, Military Nanotechnology (note 34), p.151.

National Research Council, An Assessment of Non-lethal Weapons Science and Technology (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003), p.110, at: books.nap.edu/openbook/0309082889/html/index.html

Debora Mackenzie, ‘US develops lethal new viruses’, New Scientist, 1 November, 2003, pp.6–7.

Judith Miller, Stephen Engelberg and William Broad, Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001), pp.297–8.

Peter Aldhous, ‘The bioweapon is in the post’, New Scientist, 9 November 2005.

Malcolm Dando, ‘Bioterrorism: What is the Real Threat?’, in Risk Case Studies (Nuffield Trust Global Programme on Public Health, Foreign Policy and Security, 2005).

For a wider consideration of this theme, see Moodie, Dangerous Weapons in Dangerous Hands (note 1).

Freeman Dyson, ‘Our Biotech Future’, New York Review of Books, Vol. 54, No. 12 (19 July 2007), at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20370

‘Splice it Yourself’, Wired, at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.05/view.html?pg=2; Phil McKenna, ‘Rise of the Garage Genome Hackers’, New Scientist, No. 2689, 3 January 2009, at: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126881.400-rise-of-the-garage-genome-hackers.html

For example, the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies at MIT is dedicated to ‘enhancing soldier survivability’ which includes blast and ballistic protection; see http://web.mit.edu/isn/

and materials science research for detection and protection against chemical and biological attack.

Lothar Ibrügger (Rapporteur), ‘The Security Implications of Nanotechnology’, NATO Parliamentary Assembly report, 179STCMT 05 E (2005), at: http://www.nato-pa.int/Default.asp?SHORTCUT=677

D. Fidler, ‘The International Legal Implications of “Non-Lethal” Weapons’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 21 (1999), pp.51–100.

Robert D. Pinson, ‘Is Nanotechnology Prohibited By the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions?’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, No. 2 (2004), p.298.

Neil Davison, ‘Non-Lethal’ Weapons (note 7); National Research Council, An Assessment of Non-lethal Weapons Science and Technology (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003).

Graham S. Pearson, The Search for Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: Inspection, Verification and Non-Proliferation (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005), pp.273–4.

See for example, Malcolm R. Dando, Preventing Biological Warfare: The Failure of American Leadership (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).

Altmann, Military Nanotechnology (note 34), p.70.

Sarah Perrigo and Jim Whitman (eds), The Geneva Conventions Under Assault (London: Pluto Press, 2010).

‘Nanoparticles Cross Blood-brain Barrier to Enable “Brain Tumor Painting” University of Washington News, 3 August 2009, at: http://uwnews.org/article.asp?articleid=51245

Wheelis and Dando, ‘Neurobiology: A case study of the imminent militarization of biology’ (note 4).

Bill Joy, ‘Why the Future Doesn't Need Us’, Wired, Vol. 8, No. 4 (April 2000), at: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html

Kenneth W. Abbot, Gary E. Marchant and Douglas J. Sylvester, ‘A Framework for Nanotechnology?’, Environmental Law Reporter 36 (December 2006), p.10942.

Sean Howard, ‘Nanotechnology and Mass Destruction: The Need for an Inner Space Treaty’, Disarmament Diplomacy, No. 65 (July–August 2002), at: http://www.acronym.org.uk/dd/dd65/65op1.htm

Glenn Harlan Reynolds, ‘Nanotechnology and Regulatory Policy: Three Futures’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1 (Fall 2003), pp.180–209.

‘U.S. Army Plans New Center to Develop Military Nanotech’, Small Times, 22 June 2002, at: http://www.smalltimes.com/articles/article_display.cfm?Section=ARCHI&C=Defen&ARTICLE_ID=267926&p=109

Malcolm Dando and Brian Rappert, ‘Codes of Conduct for the Life Sciences: Some Insights from UK Academia’, Bradford Briefing Paper No.16 (second series), 2005.

Brian Rappert and Caitriona McLeish (eds), A Web of Prevention: Biological Weapons, Life Sciences and the Governance of Research (London: Earthscan, 2007), at: http://www.bradford.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/briefing/BP_16_2ndseries.pdf