Horses, nails, and messages: Three defense industries of the Ukraine war

ABSTRACT

Major arms producing states and defense firms have struggled to supply the Ukraine war's massive demand for munitions. Key elements of the war—such as artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of data obtained from commercial surveillance satellites transmitted by the privately-owned Starlink network—have emerged from new providers as well as developed organically on the battlefield. Research failed to anticipate this due largely to the discipline’s focus on the “defense industry” rather than three distinct “defense industries” highlighted in the war: platforms such as tanks, commodities such as artillery shells and loitering munitions, and militarized “tech” such as commercial satellites and artificial intelligence. Understanding each requires a distinct political economic approach. Using these three lenses, the article concludes that the United States retains advantages in all three industries, Europe risks regressing into a commodities producer, and China seeks to disrupt, rather than duplicate, American defense industrial advantages in technology.

KEYWORDS:

• Ukraine
• military technology
• defense industry
• space
• defense economics

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Jordan Becker, Ethan Kapstein, Mike Poznansky, and Sam Tangredi.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).