Abstract
In this article we will explore the way in which different agents appropriate and use heritage to compete in specific power scenarios. We approach heritage discourses and practices as defining specific political arenas within which power relations are reconfigured. The protection of spaces and places as well as the processes of patrimonialisation that take place inside specific localities give rise to the emergence of new ways of exercising power. We will examine two ethnographic cases from South European mountain areas: the Parc National des Écrins in the French Alps and a Romanesque church in the Catalan Pyrenees. An analysis of both the protected area and the constructed heritage will enable us to focus on heritage as being produced, identified and valued within specific logics and value systems. We examine the dynamics that heritage and heritage policies produce in each context as well as the interest they promote. Heritage both organises different fields of forces and is appropriated by politicians, experts, and economic actors. We will discuss the entanglements, forces and dynamics that are activated and played out as a result of heritage processes in the larger process of contemporary political transformations.
Funding
This study was carried out as part of a project entitled: “El patrimonio cultural y natural en tiempos de crisis. Retos, adaptaciones y estrategias en contextos locales”, which was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the FEDER Program (CSO2015-68611-R ). The French fieldwork was also founded by the Fondation Fyssen Grant (2003).
Notes
1. The legislation on heritage is different in these two countries. For a deeper understanding of the French context, see, e.g. Babelon and Chastel (Citation1994), Audrerie (Citation1997), Davallon, Micoud, and Tardy (Citation1997), Kalaora (Citation1997), Poulot (Citation1998), Chiva (Citation1997) and Szarka (Citation2002). For Spain, see Alegre (Citation1994, Citation2012), Álvarez (Citation2004), López Bravo (Citation2004) and Querol (Citation2009).
2. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions that have obliged us to clarify our position on heritage discourses and power rhetoric.
3. Both De Certeau’s (Citation1990) and Herzfeld’s (Citation1991, Citation1997) notion of rhetoric intend to interrelate the expressive and performative dimensions of the social production of meaning. This concept helps to illustrate the nature of linguistic practices that are also ways to act upon reality.
5. ‘Traversées. La Bérarde – Refuge du Châtelleret. Un cheminement dans le massif des Écrins. Saint-Christophe-en-Oisans’ (25 June–25 September 2000), Photos by Maryvonne Arnaud, texts by Pascal Amel, Jacques Darras, Jacques Lacarrière, Hervé Planquois (Musée Dauphinois/Parc National des Écrins).
6. The introduction of the notion of ‘heritage’ in the Park language depended on the political changes in the Park and more generally in the national parks in France (Siniscalchi Citation2002).
7. Project ‘Leader II’ for example or ‘Dans les Écrins. Dossier de candidature au Programme d’initiative Européenne Leader +’ (2001, Gap, PNE).
8. It is important to note that this is one amongst different current positions amidst contemporary theories of monument restoration (Martínez Citation2000). None of the architects or technicians supporting this position mentioned the existence of different and opposing criteria in restoration discourses currently in force, some of them being closer to the position of the local builder and the parish priest.
Babelon, J. P., and A. Chastel. 1994. La Notion de patrimoine. [The Notion of Heritage] Paris: Liana Levi. Audrerie, D. 1997. La notion et la protection du patrimoine. [The Notion and Protection of Heritage] Paris: PUF. Davallon, J., A. Micoud, and C. Tardy. 1997. “Vers une évolution de la notion de patrimoine? Réflexions à propos du patrimoine rural.” [Towards an Evolution of the Concept of Heritage? Reflections on Rural Heritage] In L’esprit des lieux. Le patrimoine et la cité, [The Spirit of Places. Heritage and the City] edited by D. J. Grange and D. Poulot, 195–205. Grenoble: PUG. Kalaora, B. 1997. “Quand l’environnement devient affaire d’État.” [When the Environment Becomes an Affair of the State] In Anthropologie du politique, [Politics Anthropology] edited by M. Abélès and H.-P. Jeudy, 179–196. Paris: A. Colin. Poulot, D., ed. 1998. Patrimoine et modernité. [Heritage and Modernity] Paris: L’Harmattan. Chiva, I. 1997. “Le patrimoine rural.” [The Rural Heritage] In Science et conscience du patrimoine, [The Science and Consciousness of Heritage] edited by P. Nora, 227–231. Paris: Fayard. Szarka, J. 2002. The Shaping of Environmental Policy in France. New York: Berghahn Books. Alegre, J. M. 1994. Evolución y régimen jurídico del patrimonio histórico. [Evolution and the Legal System of Historical Heritage] Madrid: Ministerio de cultura. Álvarez, J. L. 2004. Estudios jurídicos sobre el patrimonio cultural de España. [Legal Studies concerning the Cultural Heritage of Spain] Madrid: Marcial Pons. López Bravo, C. 2004. “El patrimonio cultural inmaterial en la legislación española. Una reflexión desde la Convención de la UNESCO de 2003.” Patrimonio Cultural y Derecho 8: 203–216. Querol, M. A. 2009. “El tratamiento de los bienes inmateriales en las leyes de Patrimonio Cultural.” [The Treatment of Intangible Goods within Cultural Heritage Laws] Revista Patrimonio Cultural de España 0: 71–107. de Certeau, M. 1990. L’invention du quotidien, 1. Arts de faire. [The Practice of Everyday Life]Paris: Gallimard. Herzfeld, M. 1991. A Place in History: Social and Monumental Time in a Cretan Town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Herzfeld, M. 1997. Cultural Intimacy. Social Poetics in the Nation State. New York: Routledge. del Mármol, C. 2012. Pasados locales, políticas globales. Los procesos de patrimonialización en un valle del Pirineo catalán. [Local Pasts, Global Policies. Heritagisation Processes in a Valley of the Catalan Pyrenees]. València: Germanias, AVA. del Mármol, C. 2014. “Through Other Times: The Politics of Heritage and the Past in the Catalan Pyrenees.” In Tourism and the Power of Otherness: Seduction of Difference, edited by D. Picard and M. Di Giovine, 31–51. Bristol: Channel View Publications. Siniscalchi, V. 2002. “Patrimoine naturel et patrimoine culturel dans le Parc Naturel des Écrins (France): nouvelles représentations des territoires protégés.” [Natural and Cultural Heritage in the Parc National des Écrins (France): New Representations of Protected Areas] Europaea VIII 1 (2): 303–317. Siniscalchi, V. 2007. “Le Parc national des Écrins et la construction de la localité. Usages et représentations du territoire et de la nature dans un espace ‘protégé’.” Cahiers d’anthropologie sociale 3: 31–46. Siniscalchi, V. 2008. “Économie et pouvoir au sein du Parc National des Écrins. Penser la nature, définir l’espace.” [“Economy and Power within the Écrins National Park. Thinking Nature, Defining Space.”] Techniques et culture 50: 40–59 ( trad. 2010. “Economy and Power within the Écrins National Park. Thinking nature, defining space.” In Constructing Cultural and Natural Heritage. Parks Museums and Rurality, edited by X. Roigé and J. Frigolé, 91–106. Barcelona: ICRPC.)10.4000/tc Siniscalchi, V. 2002. “Patrimoine naturel et patrimoine culturel dans le Parc Naturel des Écrins (France): nouvelles représentations des territoires protégés.” [Natural and Cultural Heritage in the Parc National des Écrins (France): New Representations of Protected Areas] Europaea VIII 1 (2): 303–317. Martínez, J.-M. 2000. Historia y teoría de la restauración y conservación artística.[The History and Theory of Art Restoration and Conservation] Madrid: Tecnos.