![Sample our Area Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5922/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Area-Studies.jpg"})
Notes
1 Among many statements to this effect made by US officials, Klein quotes the statement issued by Ambassador Goldberg during the Israeli–Egyptian peace negotiations: “the US does not accept or recognize [the annexation of East Jerusalem] as altering the status of Jerusalem” (p. 92).
2 See in great detail chapter 3, pp. 104–57.
3 For a description of the “[b]uilding of counter [Palestinian] institutions,” see pp. 188–94.
4 Motti Golani, Tziyon ba-tziyonut: Ha-mediniyut ha-tziyonit bi-she'elat Yerusahalayim, 1937–1949 (Zion in Zionism: Zionist Policy on the Jerusalem Question, 1937–1949) (Tel Aviv, 1992).
5 Faisal Husseini declared already in 1994: “As a resident of Jerusalem I do not want the city to be divided … we want Jerusalem to be an open city, a seat of two capitals with joint arrangements for both sides.” (Quoted by Klein on p. 153.)
1 H. Eugene Bovis, The Jerusalem Question, 1917–1968 (Stanford, 1971); Bernard Wasserstein, Divided Jerusalem: The Struggle for the Holy City (London, 2001).
2 The book deals with the struggle over holy sites located anywhere between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, but due to the topic dealt with in this issue, this survey relates only to Jerusalem.
1 Motti Golani, Tziyon ba-tziyonut: Ha-mediniyut ha-tziyonit bi-she'elat Yerushalayim, 1937–69 (Zion in Zionism: Zionist Policy on the Question of Jerusalem, 1937–69) (Tel Aviv, 1992); Yossi Katz, “The Political Status of Jerusalem in Historical Context: Zionist Plans for the Partition of Jerusalem in the Years 1937–1938, Shofar, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1993), pp. 41–53.
2 In a recent example, Professor Yehoshua Ben-Arieh could not restrain himself from “responding” to a thesis advanced by Yossi Katz and myself concerning the Zionist desire to divide Jerusalem. Ben-Arieh, the editor of Yerushalayim bi-tkufat ha-mandat: Ha-asiyah veha-moreshet (Jerusalem in the British Mandate: Action and Legacy) (Jerusalem, 2003), containing the proceedings of a conference held at Mishkenot Sha'ananim in Jerusalem in the spring of 2001, inserted into the volume a contrary reaction of his own, as though he had been part of the panel, even though he had not (ibid., pp. 133–57, 162–6).