Context and Postconflict Referendums

Abstract

This article argues that referendums in societies coming out of war often fit into the conflict resolution rather than the conflict transformation paradigm. As conflict resolution devices, they may be one-off events rather than part of a longer term attempt to recalibrate relationships between antagonistic groups. Using a number of case studies, the article argues that unless the ground is prepared beforehand, referendums may have a limited ability to bring about reconciliation. Some well-timed referendums have advanced peace processes at critical moments, but these are exceptions and we should be cautious in recommending them as exemplars to other cases. The article highlights three common contextual issues that limit the conflict amelioration possibility of referendums: the exclusion of key constituencies from debates on the referendum process, a lack of voter education, and generalized insecurity.

Notes

1. John Paul Lederach, Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Culture (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1996).

2. John Paul Lederach, “Cultivating Peace: A Practitioner's View of Deadly Conflict and Negotiation,” in John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty, eds., Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 30–37; William Zartman, “The Timing of Peace Initiatives: Hurting Stalemates and Ripe Moments,” in Darby and Mac Ginty, eds., Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 19–29.

3. Roger Mac Ginty, “Constitutional Referendums and Ethnonational Conflict: The Case of Northern Ireland,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9(2): 1–22 (2003).

4. Palin cited in Dan Balz, “Sarah Palin, in Iowa, attacks Obama and ‘crony capitalism,’” Washington Post (3 Sep. 2011), http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sarah-palin-in-iowa-rails-on-president-obama-and-crony-capitalism/2011/09/03/gIQALlrizJ_story.html (accessed 12 July 2011).

5. S. Bowler and T. Donovan, “California's Experience with Direct Democracy,” Parliamentary Affairs 53(4): 377 (2002).

6. M. Schmidt, “Political Performance and Types of Democracy: Findings from Comparative Studies,” European Journal of Political Research 41: 147–63 (2002).

7. P. V. Uleri, “Italy: Referendums and Initiatives from the Origins to the Crisis of a Democratic Regime,” in M. Gallagher and P. V. Uleri, eds., The Referendum Experience in Europe (Houndsmill: Macmillan, 1996), 106–25.

8. Y. Papadopoulos, “How Does Direct Democracy Matter? The Impact of Referendum Votes on Politics and Policy-Making,” West European Politics 24(2): 35–58 (2001).

9. Arend Lijphart, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 231.

10. A. Vatter, “Consensus and Direct Democracy: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages,” European Journal of Political Research 38: 35–58 (2000).

11. Ibid.

12. J. Haskell, Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2001), 116.

13. Ibid., 116.

14. S. Bowler and T. Donovan, “Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence in Government,” British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 644–56 (2002); D. Smith and C. Tolbert, “The Initiative to Party: Partisanship and ballot initiatives in California,” Party Politics 7(6): 739–57 (2001).

15. M. Setälä, Referendums and Democratic Government: Normative Theory and the Analysis of Institutions (Houndsmill: Macmillan, 1999), 160.

16. Giovanni Sartori, Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes (Houndsmill: Macmillan, 1997), 165.

17. M. Gallagher, “Conclusion,” in M. Gallagher and P. V. Uleri, eds., The Referendum Experience in Europe (Houndsmill: Macmillan, 1996), 246.

18. Ben Reilly, “Democratic Validation,” John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty, eds., Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 174–94.

19. V. Bartkus, The Dynamic of Secession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 188.

20. Patrick Costello, “Historical Background,” Accords 2: 10 (1997); David Carey, Jr., “Maya Perspectives on the 1999 Referendum in Guatemala: Ethnic Equality Rejected?,” Latin American Perspectives 139(31): 69–95 (2004).

21. Dinorah Azpuru, Carlos Mendoza, Evelyn Blanck, and Ligia Blanco, “Democracy Assistance to Post-Conflict Guatemala: Finding a Balance Between Details and Determinants” (Working Paper 30, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, 2004), 3.

22. Brie Bailey, The Guatemalan Peace Accords: Indigenous Rights and the Promise of Peace (masters dissertation, University of Florida, 2009), 22–23.

23. Azpuru et al., “Democracy Assistance,” 2.

24. William Stanley and David Holiday, “Broad Participation, Diffuse Responsibility: Peace Implementation in Guatemala,” in Stephen John Stedman, Donald Rothchild, and Elizabeth M. Cousens, eds., Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002), 6–7; Costello, “Historical Background,” 14–16.

25. David Holiday, “Guatemala's Precarious Peace,” Current History: 78–84 (Feb. 2000); Azpuru et al., “Democracy Assistance,” 4.

26. Full Text of the Agreement on Identity and Rights of Indigenous Peoples, http://www.c-r.org/our-work/accord/guatemala/identity-rights.php (accessed 15 Aug. 2011).

27. Rachel Sieder, “Reframing citizenship: indigenous rights, local power and the peace process in Guatemala,” Accord 2: 66–73 (1997).

28. Carey, “Maya Perspectives,” 69.

29. See PDBA - Base de Datos Políticos de las Américas. Guatemala: Referéndum, 1999. Georgetown University y Organización de Estados Americanos. En (Updated on 5 Sep. 2001), http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Elecdata/Guate/ref99.html (accessed 25 Sep. 2011).

30. Dinorah Azpuru, Demetrio Cojti Cuxil, Carroll Rios de Rodiriguez, Bernardo Arevalo de Leon, and Edelberto Torres-Rivas, The Popular Referendum (Consulta Popular) and the Future of the Peace Process in Guatemala (Washington, DC: Latin American Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 20 May, 1999), 5–8; Juan Hernández Pico, “Guatemala: Why Was the Referendum Defeated?,” Envio Digital 216 (July 1999), http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/2256 (accessed 2 Sep. 2011).

31. While Cyprus (the Greek part at least) has many of the technical freedoms of an open plural democracy, its people still vote according to ethnic blocs.

32. Stanley and Holiday, “Broad Participation,” 44; Rachel Sieder, “Legal Globalization and Human Rights: Constructing the ‘Rule of Law’ in Post-Conflict Guatemala,” Crisis States Research Centre/Development Studies Institute research seminar series (18 Feb. 2004); Juan León, “The Peace Process and Indigenous Peoples in Guatemala,” in Victoria Tauli-Corpuz and Joji Carino, eds., Reclaiming Balance: Indigenous Peoples, Conflict Resolution & Sustainable Development (Baguio City, Philippines: Tebtebba Foundation, 2004), 339–40.

33. León, “Indigenous Peoples,” 333–34.

34. León, “Indigenous Peoples,” 338–9; Stanley and Holiday, “Broad Participation,” 23–24.

35. Carol A. Smith, “Mayan Nationalism,” Report on the Americas 25(3): 31 (1991).

36. León, “Indigenous Peoples,” 343–44.

37. Ibid., 343–344; Stanley and Holiday, “Broad Participation,” 22; Holiday, “Precarious Peace,” 79–81; Carey, “Maya Perspectives,” 79.

38. Demetrio Cojti Cuxil, “The Impact of the Popular Referendum on Compliance with the Indigenous Accord and on Democratization in Guatemala,” The Latin American Program Working Papers Series (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 1999), 24.

39. Ibid., 24; Information Services Latin America, “ISLA Editorial: Guatemala 1999” (May 1999), http://isla.igc.org/Features/Guatemala/guate_editorial.html (accessed 15 Sep. 2011).

40. Bobby Ghosh, “Iraq's Sunnis Weigh Referendum Boycott,” Time (4 Oct. 2005), http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1113927,00.html (accessed 15 Aug. 2011).

41. Ewen MacAskill, “UN Calls for Review of Changes to Referendum Rules in Iraq,” The Guardian (5 Oct. 2005), http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/05/iraq.ewenmacaskill/print (accessed 10 Sep. 2011).

42. EspritDeCorps, “Iraq's Referendum: A Successful Exercise?,” (2005) http://www.espritdecorps.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=117:iraqs-referendum-a-successful-exercise&catid=42:middle-east&Itemid=102 (accessed 10 Sep. 2011).

43. Article 2(1a), The Comprehensive Settlement of the Cyprus Problem cited in Unvan Atas, A Comparative Analysis of Agenda-Setting and Political Communication: A Case Study of the 2004 Cyprus Referendum (doctoral thesis, London: University of Westminster, 2010), 73.

44. Neophytos G. Loizides, Referendums in Peace Processes (Conference Paper presented at International Studies Association, New York, 2009), 19.

45. Rebecca Bryant, An Ironic Result in Cyprus, Middle East Research and Information Project, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero051204 (accessed 14 Sep. 2011).

46. Holiday, “Precarious Peace,” 79–81.

47. Carey, “Maya Perspectives,” 73; Bailey, “Peace Accords,” 19.

48. Roddy Brett and Antonio Delgado, “The Role of Constitution-Building Process in Democratization,” (Working Paper, Stockholm: International IDEA, 2005), 19.

49. Stanley and Holiday, “Broad Participation,” 21.

50. Holiday, “Precarious Peace,” 81; Bailey, “Peace Accords,” 19.

51. Hernández Pico, “Why Defeated?”

52. NotiCen, “Guatemalan Voters Reject Referendum On Constitutional Reforms,” Central American & Caribbean Affairs (1999) http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1655/is_1999_May_20/ai_n28731548/pg_2/?tag=content;col1 (accessed 20 Sep. 2011); Hernández Pico, “Why Defeated?”; Bailey, “Peace Accords,” 18.

53. Carey, “Maya Perspectives,” 76.

54. Piet Konings and Francis Nyamnjoh, “The Anglophone Problem in Cameroon,” The Journal of Modern African Studies 35(2): 207–29 (1997).

55. Bongfen Chem-Langhëë, “The Road to the Unitary State of Cameroon 1959–1972,” Paideuma 41: 17–25 (1995); Kiven James (Author's Interview, 16 Sep. 2011).

56. Piet Konings and Francis Nayamnjoh, Negotiating an Anglophone Identity (Leiden and Boston: Brill Publications, 2003), 65; Linus Asong and Simon Ndeh Chi, eds., Ndeh Ntumazah: A Conversational Auto Biography (Bamenda, Cameroon: Langaa RCPIG, 2001), 81.

57. Chem-Langhëë, “Road,” 26; Asong and Ndeh Chi, “Ndeh Ntumazah,” 80.

58. ReliefWeb, “Rwanda: EU to Observe Referendum on Constitution,” http://reliefweb.int/node/125053 (accessed 13 Sep. 2011).

59. International Crisis Group (ICG), Rwanda at the End of the Transition: A Necessary Political Liberalisation (Brussels: ICG, 2002), 6; Filip Reyntjens, “Post-1994 Politics in Rwanda: Problematising ‘Liberation’ and ‘Democratisation,’” Third World Quarterly 27(6): 1107–08 (2006).

60. Charles R. Hale, “Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala,” Journal of Latin American Studies 34(3): 490 (2002); Sieder, “Legal Globalisation,” 18–19.

61. Bailey, “Peace Accords,” 34.

62. Carey, “Maya Perspectives,” 76.

63. Holiday, “Precarious Peace,” 81.

64. Carey, “Mayan Perspectives,” 84.

65. Economist (US), “Fear and Cynicism in Guatemala (Referendum to Change Constitution Fails in Guatemala” (22 May 1999).

66. This strategy of abstention in the first general election in Jan. 2005 meant that Sunnis obtained only 17 seats (out of 275) in the Transitional National Assembly. Joost Hiltermann, “Elections and Constitution Writing in Iraq, 2005,” PAPERSIE Med 2006: 38–41 (2006).

67. The Islamic Army in Iraq, the Army of Mujahideen, the Movement of Islamic Resistance, and the Islamic Front of the Islamic Resistance.

68. James Hider, “Iraq Votes ‘Yes’ But Sunnis Warn of Backlash,” TimesOnline (26 Oct. 2005), www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article582826.ece (accessed 17 Sep. 2011); Gilbert Achcar, On the Sunni Vote in the Constitutional Referendum (2005), http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article889 (accessed 21 Sep. 2011).

69. Carlson Anyangwe, Imperialistic Politics in Cameroun: Resistance and the Inception of the Restoration of the Statehood of Southern Cameroons (Bamenda: Cameroon, 2008), 9.

70. Dieter Nohlen et al., Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 179.

71. Konings and Nyamnjoh, “Anglophone Problems,” 210; Jua Nantang and Piet Konings, “Occupation of Public Space Anglophone Nationalism in Cameroon,” Cahiers d’études africaines 175: 619 (2004/3).

72. Konings and Nyamnjoh, “Negotiating Identity,” 64–65.

73. Reyntjens, “Post-1994 Politics,” 1105.

74. Jean-Paul Kimonyo et al., “Supporting the Post-Genocide Transition in Rwanda: The Role of the International Community,” (Working Paper 32, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, 2004), 17.

75. Azpuru et al., “Democracy Assistance,” 23; Carey, “Mayan Perspectives,” 69; Bailey, “Peace Accords,” 19.

76. Elie Smith, “44 Years of Cameroon's reunification: Has it been a success?” (2005), http://www.hollerafrica.com/showArticle.php?artid=98&catld=1&page=1 (accessed 3 Feb. 2012). Konings and Nyamnjoh, “Anglophone Problems,” 210–11.

77. Loizides, Referendums, 15.

78. Jan Asmussen, “Cyprus after the Failure of the Annan-Plan,” in ECMI Brief #11 (Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues, 2004), 12–14.

79. Azpuru et al., “Democracy Assistance,” 24–31.

80. Ibid., 34–40.

81. Kimonyo et al., “Supporting the Post-Genocide Transition,” 16.