‘Digital soap opera’ online radio listening patterns and the digital divide

Abstract

This article examines the gendered digital divide in Israel in the age of the radiophonic cyber-revolution. The research focuses on increased listening patterns to on-demand, radiophonic content via online radio. Recent years have witnessed a shift in the second level of the gendered digital divide. This shift is effectively captured by the notion of ‘can’t’ transforming into a ‘don’t want to be bothered’ mindset. To explore this phenomenon an online survey was conducted on online listeners of a regional radio station. Israel’s top-rated regional station, 103FM-Non-Stop Radio, was selected. The survey was conducted in April 2014. A total of 2013 listeners were surveyed: 1491 men and 522 women. Our results found that for the under 35 years of age listeners increased listening patterns were gender-blind. The same conclusion was reached for other demographic groups: The findings from this group do, in fact, attest to a gendered digital divide. The key demographic groups here are married couples and parents. These trends highlight the continued need for further research into online radio listening patterns and their relationship to gender-related differences in the digital age.

Keywords:

• New radio
• digital divide
• gender
• on-demand services
• leisure

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Attewell, Digital Divides, 253–7; DiMaggio and Hargittai, Studying Internet Use, 12; Hargittai, Second-level Digital Divide, 14.

2. Rodino-Colocino, Laboring under the Digital Divide, 488.

3. Min, Political Internet Use, 1.

4. Zhu and Chen, The Digital Divide in Individual, 77.

5. Compaine, Information Gaps, 105.

6. DiMaggio et al., Social Implications, 325.

7. Chang, Wong, and Park, Three-tier ICT Access, 226.

8. Bonfadelli, Internet and Knowledge Gaps, 81.

9. Lin, Satellite Radio Adoption Demand, 273.

10. Johnson, Audience Use of New Media, 29.

11. Ganchiff, “Many Choices, Little Loyalty,” 7.

12. Laor and Lissitsa, Digital Radio Apps, 19.

13. Evans and Smethers, Streaming into the Future, 7.

14. Salim and Moh, On-demand Routing Protocols, 9.

15. O’Neill, Digital Audio Broadcasting, 6; Laor, Tamir, and Galili, Radio Online Platforms, 1.

16. Patrick, Black, and Whalen, CBC Radio on the Internet, 1.

17. Woodard and Omolo, Interactive Radio and Video, 47.

18. Bacalu, What Does the Internet Feed On?, 737.

19. Lin, “Online Radio Adoption,” 894.

20. Chu, The Effects of e-Learning, 263.

21. Kennedy et al., Gendering the Digital Divide, 87–8.

22. Liff and Shepherd, Gender Digital Divide?, 7–8.

23. Hargittai and Shafer, Perceived Online Skills, 441–3; Durndell and Haag, Internet by Gender, 524; Trauth, Nielsen, and von Hellens, The IT Gender Gap, 16.

24. Cheong, “Gender and Perceived Internet Efficacy,” 217–20.

25. Alqattan, The Digital Divide, 10.

26. Gunkel, Second Thoughts, 516.

27. Ritzhaupt et al., Evidence of a Digital Divide, 299.

28. Zhong, Digital Skills among Adolescents, 744.

29. Hargittai, Web-oriented Digital Literacy, 376; Imhof, Vollmeyer, and Beierlein, “Computer Use and the Gender Gap,” 2835.

30. Bertozzi and Lee, Not Just Fun and Games, 25.

31. AAUW, Tech Savvy; Brusca, “The Technological Gender Gap,” 30; Cassell and Jenkins, Gender and Computer Games, 273.

32. Perrons, “Understanding Social and Spatial Divisions,” 45.

33. Yi and Hwang, Web-based Information Systems, 442–3; Kerr, Kucklich, and Brereton, New Media‒New Pleasures?, 24.

34. Rappaport, Shopping for Pleasure, 93.

35. Nelson, Status, Gender, and Consumer Nationalism, 21.

36. Banerjee, Consumer Behaviour on Online Shopping, 52.

37. Donthu and Garcia, The Internet Shopper, 52; Korgaonkar and Wolin, Analysis of Web Usage, 66; Kwak, Fox, and Zinkhan, Promoted via the Internet, 29; Lightner et al., Shopping Behaviour in e-Commerce, 375; Koyuncu and Lien, E-commerce, 721; Brown, Pope, and Voges, Buying or Browsing?, 1677; Kim and Kim, Predicting Online Purchase, 892.

38. Koerning and Granitz, “Progressive Yet Traditional,” 81.

39. Mabweazara, “‘Pirate’ Radio,” 240.

40. Chiumbu and Ligaga, The Changing Nature of Radio, 249.

41. Nassanga and Lopes, ICTs and Radio, 265.

42. Akhter, Digital Divide and Purchase Intention, 5; DiMaggio et al., Digital Inequality, 7; Livingstone, Bober, and Helsper, Inequalities and the Digital Divide, 2; Livingstone and Helsper, Gradations in Digital Inclusion, 10; Cohen, “Growing Information, Part I,” 449. Trultzsch, Kouts-klemm, and Aroldi, “Transforming Digital Divides,” 191; Tsatsou, Why Internet Use?, 79; Tsatsou, Digital Divide Revisited, 327; Tsatsou, Digital Divide in Europe, 134.

43. Agresti, Ordinal Categorical Data, 43–7.

44. Abdi, “Bonferroni and Šidák Corrections,” 1‒9.

45. Lavie and Lehman-Wilzig, Gender and New Production, 76–9.

46. Lavi, “Men are the Discourse,” 297.

47. Tacchi, “Gender, Fantasy and Radio,” 152.

48. Hobson, “Housewives and the Media,” 105.

49. Plafrey and Gasser, Born Digital, 1.

50. Livingstone and Helsper, Gradations in Digital Inclusion, 12–14.

51. Bonfadelli, Internet and Knowledge Gaps, 79; Parycek, Sachs, and Schossbock, “Digital Divide among Youth,” 161.