71
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Patenting Perspective

The challenges of joint performance to method patents

Pages 393-399 | Received 13 Oct 2016, Accepted 28 Feb 2017, Published online: 13 Mar 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Biotech patents are facing increasingly stern challenges. The patent statue holds that a multi-step method patent is not directly infringed unless all steps are carried out and attributed to a single entity. When separate steps are performed jointly by two or more parties, those parties are liable for divided infringement if there exists a direct infringement. Possibilities thus exist for unauthorized but non-infringing joint performance, i.e. enforcing a method patent will be difficult if joint performance stands as a valid defense against direct infringement.

Areas covered: This analysis covers issues on patent infringement, specifically on divided infringement of diagnostic and method patents.

Expert opinion: A retrospective analysis indicates that a large number of cancer diagnostic patents issued during 2005-2014 are potentially vulnerable to read on unauthorized use in the manner of joint performance. Inventors should draft patent claims appropriately to reduce the risk to assert their patents in this regard.

Article highlights

  • Would-be infringers may avoid being responsible for patent infringement by dividing patent components between two or more parties for performance.

  • Multi-step method patents are especially vulnerable to such unauthorized joint performance.

  • A retrospective analysis on cancer diagnostic patents issued 2005-2014 reveals that more than half of the patents include claims potentially vulnerable to unauthorized joint performance.

  • Proper claim drafting can remedy this vulnerability.

This box summarizes the key points contained in the article.

Declaration of interest

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Supplemental meterial

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the intramural funding of National Health Research Institutes (105-IPHS-PP06).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,757.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.