424
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Differential patterns in mind perception in subclinical paranoia: relationships to self-reported empathy

, , &
Pages 137-144 | Received 09 Oct 2015, Accepted 18 Jan 2017, Published online: 15 Feb 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Although social cognition skills and biases are well-studied in paranoia, “mind perception” – perceiving the extent to which someone even possesses a thinking, feeling mind – is not. We sought to better characterise the profile of mind perception for individuals with paranoia.

Methods: We examined links between mind perception and paranoia in a large (n = 890) subclinical sample. Participants completed measures of paranoia, schizotypy, mind perception, and dispositional empathy. These assessments were examined for their relationships to one another, as well as the possibility that mind perception partially mediates the relationship between paranoia and empathy.

Results: Analyses revealed that increased paranoia was linked to less mind perception towards people. This distorted mind perception partially explained the link between paranoia and both perspective taking and empathic concern.

Conclusions: In paranoia – and psychopathology more broadly – understanding and addressing distorted mind perception may be one component of restoring social functioning.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 One potential alternative explanation for these results is that higher paranoia is linked to more random responding, pulling ratings towards the center of the scale and away from extremes, in which humans (high extreme) and objects (low extreme) reside. However, such random responding would not reveal a meaningful mediational pattern, which we investigate next.

2 Although the main effect of paranoia on empathic concern was not significant controlling for schizotypy, we still ran the analysis of indirect effects on the basis of theoretical predictions (see Shrout & Bolger, Citation2002).

Additional information

Funding

Dr Gray’s work is supported in part by the Templeton Funded Imagination Institute (RFP-15-11), National Science Foundation (SES-1534083), Russell Sage Foundation (93-16-08), and the Charles Koch Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 267.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.