Abstract
Purpose: VAP-1 plays a crucial role in inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction which are main pathophysiologic mechanisms for gestational diabetes. We aimed to determine serum VAP-1 levels, assess its diagnostic value and correlation with clinical parameters in gestational diabetes.
Methods: A total of 60 pregnant women with gestational diabetes and 75 healthy pregnant women between 24–28th gestational weeks between January–June 2017 were included. Pregnant women were screened for gestational diabetes by two-step protocol. Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters of patients were recorded. VAP-1 was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.
Results: Gestational diabetes group had higher fasting and postprandial glucose, HbA1c, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratio, plateletcrit and C-reactive protein. Furthermore, VAP-1 levels were higher in gestational diabetes (3.35 ± 1.52 vs 2.2 ± 0.74; p < 0.001). VAP-1 levels >2.315 could predict gestational diabetes with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 65.3%. VAP-1 was correlated with clinical follow-up parameters such as fasting glucose (r = 0.473, p < 0.001), postprandial glucose (r = 0.416, p < 0.001), HbA1c (r = 0.462, p < 0.001) and inflammatory biomarkers such as platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratio (r = 0.254, p = 0.04), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (r = 0.375, p = 0.003) and C-reactive protein (r = 0.306, p = 0.017).
Conclusions: Elevated VAP-1 levels in gestational diabetes correlated with clinical follow-up and inflammatory markers may suggest the pathogenetic role of VAP-1 in gestational diabetes. Hence, we think that VAP-1 could be a promising marker for the prediction of gestational diabetes.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors have had full control of all primary data and they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.