ABSTRACT
The market for local food has grown considerably over the course of thirty years. At the same time, even robust local food systems may reproduce injustices that have long marred corporatized food systems. In this paper, we explore the relationship of environmental justice to local food systems by asking two questions. First, are farmers markets (FMs) more likely to be found in wealthier, whiter communities? Second, are FMs providing people who are not members of socially privileged groups with an opportunity to buy food grown in accordance with organic principles? Drawing on survey data from FMs in New Jersey, we find that, although community demographics are strongly associated with FM location, social privilege is not associated with where organic farmers sell produce, once the lens of analysis is narrowed to just communities with an FM. But although food grown without agricultural chemicals is widely available at FMs in the study area, organic farmers who accept payment via WIC or SNAP are not more likely to sell at FMs in lower-income communities, and fewer organic farmers than non-organic farmers accept payment via WIC or SNAP. The presence of organic farmers at FMs in a wide range of communities suggests that expanding access to locally sourced fruits and vegetables may be able to play a small but not insignificant role in reducing exposure to agricultural chemicals. However, organic food would be more accessible at FMs in low-income communities if more organic farmers participated in nutrition assistance programmes like WIC and SNAP.
Acknowledgements
We extend our thanks and appreciation to the students who worked on this project, including April Nicklaus, Evan Berman, Emma Bouton, Phil Croteau, Stephanie Kealy, Louis McGuigan, Jackie Melgar-Vasquez, Isabel Rodriguez, Kristin Terez and Adam Yawdoszyn. We are also grateful to the farmers and market managers throughout New Jersey who participated in the survey. Funding for this project was provided by the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences at Rutgers University.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
Data and research instruments for this study are archived at Harvard Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PHSB9B.