Publication Cover
Journal of Sexual Aggression
An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice
Volume 23, 2017 - Issue 1: Online sex offending – approaches to assessment and intervention
2,931
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Internet sexual offending from an anthropological perspective: analysing offender perceptions of online spaces

Pages 33-45 | Received 29 Nov 2015, Accepted 08 Jun 2016, Published online: 14 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

This paper is based on anthropological research focused on users of online child sexual exploitation material. The empirical foundations are 17 months of participant-observation in UK group programmes for offenders, and semi-structured interviews with group participants and programme staff. While explanations for offending often emphasise individual-psychological characteristics of offenders, I suggest attention should also be given to offender perceptions and constructions of online spaces. For many in the sample, decision-making and the choice to view material were influenced by perceived boundaries and associated altered features of social interaction, said to demarcate online environments from other contexts. Participants perceived online offending spaces as lacking the interaction and potential gaze of others that normally reinforce social norms. This resulted in a feeling of freedom to break norms of childhood and sexuality online, contrasting offline society where such norms are actively reinforced. The article therefore localises factors for Internet offending in social processes.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Sarah-Ann Burger and Pearl Rimer for commenting on an earlier draft of this paper. Thank you to the two anonymous reviewers who provided excellent feedback on an earlier version, and to Hannah Merdian and Derek Perkins for guest editing this journal issue. I would also like to thank Jo Boyden and Caroline Potter for their mentorship. Finally, I would like to thank the fieldwork staff and all participants for providing me with unparalleled access and agreeing to participate.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK under a Commonwealth Scholarship; the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada under a Doctoral Fellowship; and the Royal Anthropological Institute under a Sutasoma Award.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 375.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.