574
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Preferring patient–physician concordance: the ambiguity of implicit ethnic bias

Pages 1065-1081 | Received 09 Feb 2019, Accepted 14 May 2019, Published online: 20 May 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Much of the current literature on racial/ethnic bias in healthcare focuses on practitioners’ implicit biased attitudes regarding patients, identifying it as a factor contributing to health disparities. Little attention has been paid, however, to patients’ bias against practitioners from other ethnic group.

Aim: To explore patients’ bias towards practitioners from other ethnic group.

Method: In-depth interviews were conducted during 2018 with 38 Israeli Jewish and Arab patients.

Findings: While many participants (more Jews than Arabs) reported that they perceive medical treatment as neutral and value the physician’s professionalism and attitude, others (more Arabs than Jews) attested that they do prefer to be treated by physicians of their own ethnic group. Jewish patients who prefer Jewish physicians described bias against Arab physicians: Feelings of fear and distrust, particularly in light of the conflictual situation in Israel. They also considered Arab physicians less professional than Jewish ones. Arab patients who prefer Arab physicians described their need for culturally and linguistically competent healthcare and praised close informal relations with Arab physicians, contrasting them with past offensive and humiliating experiences with Jewish physicians.

Conclusions: Findings reveal several factors that impact Jewish and Arab Israeli patients’ preference for patient–physician concordance, some of which reflect patients’ implicit bias. This phenomenon – together with practitioners’ implicit bias against patients – should be recognized as contributing to the ambiguity of ethnic relations in clinical encounters, particularly in conflictual societies.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by research was financed by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 440.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.