1,348
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring mental illness stigma among Asian men mobilized to become Community Mental Health Ambassadors in Toronto Canada

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 100-118 | Received 24 Jun 2018, Accepted 07 Jun 2019, Published online: 24 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Stigma of mental illness contributes to silence, denial and delayed help seeking. Existing stigma reduction strategies seldom consider gender and cultural contexts.

Purpose

The Strengths in Unity study was a multi-site Canadian study that engaged Asian men in three stigma reduction interventions (ACT, CEE, psychoeducation) and mobilized them as Community Mental Health Ambassadors. Our participants included both men living with or affected by mental illness (LWA) as well as community leaders (CL). This paper will: (1) describe the baseline characteristics of the Toronto participants including their sociodemographic information, mental illness stigma (CAMI and ISMI), attitudes towards social change (SJS), and intervention-related process variables (AAQ-II, VLQ, FMI, Empowerment); (2) compare the differences among these variables between LWA and CL; and (3) explore factors that may correlate with socio-economic status and mental health stigma.

Results

A total of 609 Asian men were recruited in Toronto, Canada. Both CL and LWA had similar scores on measures of external and internalized stigma and social change attitudes, except that LWA had more positive views about the acceptance and integration of those with mental illness into the community on the CAMI, while CL had a higher level of perceived behavioral control on the SJS. Group differences were also observed between LWA and CL in some process-related variables. Exploratory analysis suggests that younger and more educated participants had lower stigma.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore the importance of engaging both community leaders and people with lived experience as mental health advocates to address stigma.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 There was no statistically significant difference between CLs that filled out the ISMI (n = 98) and those that did not in all measures of stigmatizing attitudes.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Movember Foundation under MH004.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 440.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.