802
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Interprofessional collaboration and diabetes care in Switzerland: A mixed-methods study

, , , &
Pages 351-359 | Received 23 Dec 2015, Accepted 13 Jan 2017, Published online: 28 Feb 2017
 

ABSTRACT

To face the increasing prevalence of diabetes in Switzerland, a cantonal programme has been implemented. One of its goals is to promote collaborative approaches among healthcare professionals (HCPs). The objectives of the current study were to examine HCPs’ perceptions about the collaboration they experience in diabetes care and to determine whether perceptions differed among professional groups. A mixed-methods study was conducted. First, a total of 332 HCPs comprising diabetes specialists and non-specialists participated by completing a questionnaire on interprofessional collaboration. Focus groups were then led in order to deepen the understanding and complement the interpretation of quantitative results. Quantitative results showed a perception of a moderate level of collaboration. Mean scores for specialists were systematically worse than those of non-specialists and more prominently in the “level of conflict dimension,” which means that specialists generally perceived a lower level of collaboration and a higher level of possible conflict associated with it. Qualitative results highlighted the vagueness in role definition and emphasised a form of reluctance by general physicians to collaborate with specialists, as the physicians felt that they were losing their responsibilities. The findings suggest that it is not the need to collaborate that encourages HCPs involved in collaborative schemes to desire or to know how to successfully initiate, promote, or conduct interprofessional collaboration. This study highlights the important perceptions about collaboration that could be taken into account when planning future collaborative programmes.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the  by the Department of Public Health of the canton of Vaud (‘Programme cantonal Diabète’) and by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health—FOPH. Prof. I. Peytremann-Bridevaux is currently supported by a Swiss School of Public Health + (SSPH+) Assistant Professorship grant.

Notes

1. It should be noted that focus groups were conducted in French; therefore, we translated the quotations into English while respecting the meaning (semantic content).

Additional information

Funding

This study was financially supported by the  by the Department of Public Health of the canton of Vaud (‘Programme cantonal Diabète’) and by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health—FOPH. Prof. I. Peytremann-Bridevaux is currently supported by a Swiss School of Public Health + (SSPH+) Assistant Professorship grant.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,151.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.