An interdisciplinary view of medical pluralism among Mexican-Americans

Abstract

This article highlights the relationship between traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) and biomedicine, and the challenges this relationship poses to patients. Medical professionals tend to represent these systems dualistically – as mutually exclusive and in competition with one another. Patients, on the other hand, tend to make truly pluralistic health care decisions – moving freely between TCAM and biomedicine based on what they can access, what they can relate to, and what they believe works. Using their experience with Mexican immigrant and Mexican-American populations in Southwestern United States, the authors discuss strengths and weaknesses in both healthcare systems, and how medical dualism can be a significant barrier to effective healthcare. Recent literature on medical pluralism is discussed from the public health (i.e., community) and medical (i.e., provider) perspectives. These two disciplines are brought together in an attempt to deconstruct the notion that TCAM and biomedicine are diametrically opposed healthcare systems. Biomedically trained health care providers must understand, appreciate, and integrate into their practice how their patients make use of other healing practices and beliefs. Such integration is particularly essential when serving immigrant or minority populations as these groups are more likely to use a pluralistic approach in meeting their health needs.

Keywords:

• Traditional
• complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM)
• biomedicine
• medical pluralism
• medical duality
• botanica
• health protection/maintenance

Notes

1. Culture-bound syndromes refers to health disorders that are uniquely defined within a particular culture.