711
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transforming supervisors? A critique of post-liberal approaches to research supervision

&
Pages 279-289 | Published online: 24 Apr 2008
 

Abstract

Preparation for research supervision has assumed greater importance in academic departments of universities with the increase in the number and diversity of both research candidates and supervisors and the financial incentives for on-time completions. Over the past decade a body of literature by both academics and academic developers has emerged and more recently post-liberal theories and frameworks (feminism, postmodernism and post-colonialism) have been used to problematise the field of postgraduate supervision. Central to the feminist and post-colonial critiques is the belief that supervisors are best equipped for their roles by a process of personal self-transformation which allows them to achieve an appropriate balance between emotional and rational elements in their supervisory practice. We wish to set critical and post-modern approaches in historical perspective. We seek to show that feminist and post-colonial approaches are heir to a form of critique, which was founded upon the assumption that certain institutions and practices of modern society are dehumanising because they fragment human beings’ essential unity. We argue that engaging supervisors in a process of self-transformation reinforces the idea that successful supervision is a function of the supervisor's recovery of a fully integrated and higher self.

Notes

1. The idea of an Enlightenment project has been questioned in recent scholarship on the enlightenment in national contexts. For the central role accorded to the emotions by writers of the period, see Barbalet (Citation2000), Firth (Citation2007), Hume (Citation1967), and Smith (Citation1976).

2. Foucault (Citation1991) uses the term ‘the governmentalised state’ to refer to the development, in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, of administrative techniques and practices (government bureaucracies, social statistics, mass schooling, prisons and hospitals) through which governments in Western Europe sought to secure social peace and economic prosperity.

3. McWilliam's (Citation2002) outright rejection of professional development which Manathunga quotes repeatedly seems based on a few instances of badly organised and delivered programmes.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 467.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.