There has recently been a renaissance of interest in ideological analysis, and this is to be greatly welcomed. However, there is a noticeable lack of concern with international political ideologies, a position that mirrors the pernicious disciplinary dichotomy between political theory and international relations (IR) theory. In this essay I offer a critique of this state-centric understanding of ideology, and consequently offer an extension of Michael Freeden's morphological approach. In order to demonstrate the utility of this extension, I offer an innovative analysis of contemporary political realism, an ideology that has played an important role in recent US academic and policy debates, most notably in the current Bush administration. It is argued that much contemporary realism is conceptually sovereign-centric rather than, as is commonly assumed, state-centric. The other two central concepts are anarchy and power.
Anarchy, power and death: Contemporary political realism as ideology
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.