ABSTRACT
Populism’s recent ascent to power in many countries has fueled the discussion of anti-populist responses. This paper investigates anti-populism’s implications for economic policy and policymaking. Anti-populism has been shown to manifest alongside and through both neoliberalism and technocracy; this paper investigates how anti-populism shapes the manifestation of neoliberalism and technocracy, and how they can be in turn employed to strengthen anti-populist logic. I consider the case of Israel’s anti-populist coalition (2021–2022), which replaced the populist former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. After reviewing the existing literature on anti-populism, I discuss behaviour modification taxation’s role in and importance for anti-populist policy agendas. I analyse the discourse surrounding the implementation of behaviour modification taxation and its implications in Israel, showing that anti-populists can use such policies to not only hurt populist voters but also replace ‘the people’ in the political imagination with rational, incentive-driven individuals.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee at University of Haifa, approval number 327/21
Notes
1 Tweet from official account, 11/22/2022 https://twitter.com/tamarzandberg/status/1594954196331159552.
2 Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee at University of Haifa, approval number 327/21.
3 Just under the hourly minimum wage rate.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Asaf Yakir
Asaf Yakir is a PhD candidate for political science, at the University of Haifa, Israel, He holds a B.A in Jewish History and an M.A in political science, both from the University of Haifa. His PhD project deals with the political economy of right-wing populist governments, and the anti-populist reactions they generate.